Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32857955›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Global health2020

Immediate impact of stay-at-home orders to control COVID-19 transmission on socioeconomic conditions, food insecurity, mental health, and intimate partner violence in Bangladeshi women and their families: an interrupted time series.

Jena Derakhshani Hamadani, Mohammed Imrul Hasan, Andrew J Baldi, Sheikh Jamal Hossain, Shamima Shiraji, Mohammad Saiful Alam Bhuiyan, Syeda Fardina Mehrin, Jane Fisher, Fahmida Tofail, S M Mulk Uddin Tipu and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 224 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
224citing papers in PubMed, 14 pooled it
118.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

224 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 482 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

164 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Jena Derakhshani HamadaniInternational Center for Diarrhoeal Diseases Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Mohammed Imrul HasanInternational Center for Diarrhoeal Diseases Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Andrew J BaldiPopulation Health and Immunity Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Sheikh Jamal HossainInternational Center for Diarrhoeal Diseases Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Shamima ShirajiInternational Center for Diarrhoeal Diseases Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Mohammad Saiful Alam BhuiyanInternational Center for Diarrhoeal Diseases Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Syeda Fardina MehrinInternational Center for Diarrhoeal Diseases Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Jane FisherDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Fahmida TofailInternational Center for Diarrhoeal Diseases Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
S M Mulk Uddin TipuInternational Center for Diarrhoeal Diseases Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Sally Grantham-McGregorInstitute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
Beverley-Ann BiggsDepartment of Medicine, Peter Doherty Institute, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Sabine BraatDepartment of Medicine, Peter Doherty Institute, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Sant-Rayn PasrichaPopulation Health and Immunity Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Diagnostic Haematology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Clinical Haematology at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC Australia. Electronic address: pasricha.s@wehi.edu.au.
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BDMonash University · AUPeter Doherty Institute · AUPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUUniversity College London · GBWalter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStay-at-home orders (lockdowns) have been deployed globally to control COVID-19 transmission, and might impair economic conditions and mental health, and exacerbate risk of food insecurity and intimate partner violence. The effect of lockdowns in low-income and middle-income countries must be understood to ensure safe deployment of these interventions in less affluent settings. We aimed to determine the immediate impact of COVID-19 lockdown orders on women and their families in rural Bangladesh.

methodsAn interrupted time series was used to compare data collected from families in Rupganj upazila, rural Bangladesh (randomly selected from participants in a randomised controlled trial), on income, food security, and mental health a median of 1 year and 2 years before the COVID-19 pandemic to data collected during the lockdown. We also assessed women's experiences of intimate partner violence during the pandemic.

resultsBetween May 19 and June 18, 2020, we randomly selected and invited the mothers of 3016 children to participate in the study, 2424 of whom provided consent. 2414 (99·9%, 95% CI 99·6-99·9) of 2417 mothers were aware of, and adhering to, the stay-at-home advice. 2321 (96·0%, 95·2-96·7) of 2417 mothers reported a reduction in paid work for the family. Median monthly family income fell from US$212 at baseline to $59 during lockdown, and the proportion of families earning less than $1·90 per day rose from five (0·2%, 0·0-0·5) of 2422 to 992 (47·3%, 45·2-49·5) of 2096 (p<0·0001 comparing baseline with lockdown period). Before the pandemic, 136 (5·6%, 4·7-6·6) of 2420 and 65 (2·7%, 2·1-3·4) of 2420 families experienced moderate and severe food insecurity, respectively. This increased to 881 (36·5%, 34·5-38·4) of 2417 and 371 (15·3%, 13·9-16·8) of 2417 during the lockdown; the number of families experiencing any level of food insecurity increased by 51·7% (48·1-55·4; p<0·0001). Mothers' depression and anxiety symptoms increased during the lockdown. Among women experiencing emotional or moderate physical violence, over half reported it had increased since the lockdown.

interpretationCOVID-19 lockdowns present significant economic, psychosocial, and physical risks to the wellbeing of women and their families across economic strata in rural Bangladesh. Beyond supporting only the most socioeconomically deprived, support is needed for all affected families.

fundingNational Health and Medical Research Council, Australia.

Indexed as

AdultBangladeshChild, PreschoolCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19FamilyFemaleFood SupplyHumansIncomeInfantInterrupted Time Series AnalysisIntimate Partner ViolenceMaleMental DisordersMothers

Identifiers

PMID32857955
PMCPMC7447230
OpenAlexW3080714299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.