Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32857853›Full record

ReviewNucleic acids research2020

Recent advances in the nucleolar responses to DNA double-strand breaks.

Lea Milling Korsholm, Zita Gál, Blanca Nieto, Oliver Quevedo, Stavroula Boukoura, Casper Carstens Lund, Dorthe Helena Larsen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nucleic acids research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lea Milling KorsholmDanish Cancer Society Research Center, Nucleolar Stress and Disease Group, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Zita GálDanish Cancer Society Research Center, Nucleolar Stress and Disease Group, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Blanca NietoDanish Cancer Society Research Center, Nucleolar Stress and Disease Group, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Oliver QuevedoDanish Cancer Society Research Center, Nucleolar Stress and Disease Group, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Stavroula BoukouraDanish Cancer Society Research Center, Nucleolar Stress and Disease Group, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Casper Carstens LundDanish Cancer Society Research Center, Nucleolar Stress and Disease Group, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Dorthe Helena LarsenDanish Cancer Society Research Center, Nucleolar Stress and Disease Group, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Danish Cancer Society · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA damage poses a serious threat to human health and cells therefore continuously monitor and repair DNA lesions across the genome. Ribosomal DNA is a genomic domain that represents a particular challenge due to repetitive sequences, high transcriptional activity and its localization in the nucleolus, where the accessibility of DNA repair factors is limited. Recent discoveries have significantly extended our understanding of how cells respond to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in the nucleolus, and new kinases and multiple down-stream targets have been identified. Restructuring of the nucleolus can occur as a consequence of DSBs and new data point to an active regulation of this process, challenging previous views. Furthermore, new insights into coordination of cell cycle phases and ribosomal DNA repair argue against existing concepts. In addition, the importance of nucleolar-DNA damage response (n-DDR) mechanisms for maintenance of genome stability and the potential of such factors as anti-cancer targets is becoming apparent. This review will provide a detailed discussion of recent findings and their implications for our understanding of the n-DDR. The n-DDR shares features with the DNA damage response (DDR) elsewhere in the genome but is also emerging as an independent response unique to ribosomal DNA and the nucleolus.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCell NucleolusDNA RepairDNA, RibosomalGenomic InstabilityHomologous RecombinationHumansNeoplasmsNuclear ProteinsPhosphoproteinsAntineoplastic AgentsDNA, RibosomalNuclear ProteinsPhosphoproteinsTCOF1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID32857853
PMCPMC7515731
OpenAlexW3081835407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.