Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32857849›Full record

ArticleRadiation research2020

Evaluating the Reproducibility of Mouse Anatomy under Rotation in a Custom Immobilization Device for Conformal FLASH Radiotherapy.

Ryan B Ko, Luis A Soto, Rie von Eyben, Stavros Melemenidis, Erinn B Rankin, Peter G Maxim, Edward E Graves, Billy W Loo

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ryan B KoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Luis A SotoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Rie von EybenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Stavros MelemenidisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Erinn B RankinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Peter G MaximDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Edward E GravesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Billy W LooDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Stanford University · USIndiana University School of Medicine

Funding

Leveraging innovative technologies in basic and clinical cancer researchT32CA009302 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LAURA D ATTARDI, Aaron M Newman · 1985 to 2026
$19.1M
Project 4: Mechanistic Basics of FLASH Effect: Role of O2P01CA244091 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI LIMOLI, CHARLES · 2020 to 2024
$9.6M
Radiation-Induced Tumor Cell MigrationR01CA197136 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GRAVES, EDWARD E. · 2015 to 2019
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA244091NCI NIH HHS R01 CA197136NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009302
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The observation of an enhanced therapeutic index for FLASH radiotherapy in mice has created interest in practical laboratory-based FLASH irradiators. To date, systems capable of 3D conformal FLASH irradiation in mice have been lacking. We are developing such a system, incorporating a high-current linear accelerator to produce a collimated X-ray beam in a stationary beamline design, rotating the mouse about a longitudinal axis to achieve conformal irradiation from multiple beam directions. The purpose of this work was to evaluate the reproducibility of mouse anatomy under rotation at speeds compatible with conformal FLASH delivery. Three short-hair mice and two hairless mice were immobilized under anesthesia in body weight-specific contoured plastic molds, and subjected to three rotational (up to 3 revolutions/s) and two non-rotational movement interventions. MicroCT images were acquired before and after each intervention. The displacements of 11 anatomic landmarks were measured on the image pairs. The displacement of the anatomical landmarks with any of the interventions was 0.5 mm or less for 92.4% of measurements, with a single measurement out of 275 (11 landmarks × 5 interventions × 5 mice) reaching 1 mm. There was no significant difference in the displacements associated with rotation compared to those associated with moving the immobilized mouse in and out of a scanner or with leaving the mouse in place for 5 min with no motion. There were no significant differences in displacements between mice with or without hair, although the analysis is limited by small numbers, or between different anatomic landmarks. These results show that anatomic reproducibility under rotation speed corresponding to FLASH irradiation times appears to be compatible with conformal/stereotactic irradiation in mice.

Indexed as

AnimalsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, NudePhantoms, ImagingRadiotherapy, ConformalReproducibility of ResultsRotationX-Ray Microtomography

Identifiers

PMID32857849
PMCPMC7856226
OpenAlexW3081776322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.