ArticlePloS one2020
Direct-from-sputum rapid phenotypic drug susceptibility test for mycobacteria.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- QMAC-DST for Rapid Detection of Drug Resistance in Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients: A Multicenter Pre-Post Comparative Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Evolution of tuberculosis diagnostics: From molecular strategies to nanodiagnostics.Tuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe spread of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is a leading global public-health challenge. Because not all biological mechanisms of resistance are known, culture-based (phenotypic) drug-susceptibility testing (DST) provides important information that influences clinical decision-making. Current phenotypic tests typically require pre-culture to ensure bacterial loads are at a testable level (taking 2-4 weeks) followed by 10-14 days to confirm growth or lack thereof. METHODS AND
findingsWe present a 2-step method to obtain DST results within 3 days of sample collection. The first involves selectively concentrating live mycobacterial cells present in relatively large volumes of sputum (~2-10mL) using commercially available magnetic-nanoparticles (MNPs) into smaller volumes, thereby bypassing the need for pre-culture. The second involves using microchannel Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy (m-EIS) to monitor multiple aliquots of small volumes (~10μL) of suspension containing mycobacterial cells, MNPs, and candidate-drugs to determine whether cells grow, die, or remain static under the conditions tested. m-EIS yields an estimate for the solution "bulk capacitance" (Cb), a parameter that is proportional to the number of live bacteria in suspension. We are thus able to detect cell death (bactericidal action of the drug) in addition to cell-growth. We demonstrate proof-of-principle using M. bovis BCG and M. smegmatis suspended in artificial sputum. Loads of ~ 2000-10,000 CFU of mycobacteria were extracted from ~5mL of artificial sputum during the decontamination process with efficiencies of 84% -100%. Subsequently, suspensions containing ~105 CFU/mL of mycobacteria with 10 mg/mL of MNPs were monitored in the presence of bacteriostatic and bactericidal drugs at concentrations below, at, and above known MIC (Minimum Inhibitory Concentration) values. m-EIS data (ΔCb) showed data consistent with growth, death or stasis as expected and/or recorded using plate counts. Electrical signals of death were visible as early as 3 hours, and growth was seen in < 3 days for all samples, allowing us to perform DST in < 3 days.
conclusionWe demonstrated "proof of principle" that (a) live mycobacteria can be isolated from sputum using MNPs with high efficiency (almost all the bacteria that survive decontamination) and (b) that the efficacy of candidate drugs on the mycobacteria thus isolated (in suspensions containing MNPs) could be tested in real-time using m-EIS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.