SynthesisPloS one2020
Association between cerebral oximetry and return of spontaneous circulation following cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cerebral oxygen monitoring during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A scoping review.Resuscitation plus · 2025Review
- Wolf Creek XVII Part 6: Physiology-Guided CPR.Resuscitation plus · 2024Review
- Integrating rSOResuscitation plus · 2024Article
- Association between regional cerebral oxygen saturation and outcome of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: An observational study.Resuscitation plus · 2023Article
- Continuous monitoring of brain perfusion by cerebral oximetry after spontaneous return of circulation in cardiac arrest: a case report.BMC neurology · 2022Article
- Optical imaging and spectroscopy for the study of the human brain: status report.Neurophotonics · 2022Article
- Extremely low regional cerebral oxygen saturation during general anesthesia in severe sepsis: A report of two cases.Saudi journal of anaesthesiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present meta-analysis was based on the available studies to determine the potential role of the initial and regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2) in monitoring the efficiency of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and predicting the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Three electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify the studies that investigated the role of rSO2 on ROSC in CA patients throughout May 2018. The weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated to estimate the pooled effect using a random-effects model. Sensitivity, subgroup analyses, and publication bias were conducted. A total of 13 studies involving 678 CA patients (300 in-hospital (IH) patients, and 378 out-hospital (OH) patients) were included. The summary WMD suggested that ROSC patients were associated with higher initial rSO2 (WMD: 10.10%; 95% CI: 5.66-14.55; P<0.001) and mean rSO2 (WMD: 14.16%; 95% CI: 10.51-17.81; P<0.001) levels during CA and ROSC as compared to the non-ROSC. The results of meta-regression suggested that the male percentage and the location of cardiac arrest might bias the initial or mean rSO2 and the incidence of ROSC. These significant differences were observed in nearly all subsets. The findings of this study suggested that high initial or mean rSO2 levels were both associated with an increased incidence of ROSC in CA patients undergoing CPR. These correlations might be affected by the percentage of males or the location of cardiac arrest, thereby necessitating further large-scale studies to substantiate whether these correlations differ according to gender and the location of cardiac arrest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.