Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32857226›Full record

ArticleNanoscale research letters2020

Nano-clays as Potential Pseudo-antibodies for COVID-19.

Sahel N Abduljauwad, Taimur Habib, Habib-Ur-Rehman Ahmed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanoscale research letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Application of nanoparticles in antibody drug delivery.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Presence and persistence of SARS-CoV-2 in aquatic environments: A mini-review.Current opinion in environmental science & health · 2022
    Review
  4. Immunology and controlling of coronaviruses; the current enemy for humanity: A review.International journal of biological macromolecules · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Niclosamide encapsulated in mesoporous silica and geopolymer: A potential oral formulation for COVID-19.Microporous and mesoporous materials : the official journal of the International Zeolite Association · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sahel N AbduljauwadCivil & Environmental Engineering department, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals (KFUPM), Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
Taimur HabibRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Bahrain campus, Busaiteen, Bahrain.
Habib-Ur-Rehman AhmedEngineering & Research International (ERI), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. habibrehman@kfupm.edu.sa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2452-5111

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite several efforts, the development of an effective vaccine for COVID-19 may take a much longer time. Traditional/natural medicine, already experienced by humans, could be an earlier solution. Considering the research team's experience in using nano-clays as high-affinity material for cancer metastasis, melanoma treatment, and bone regeneration, we propose to use these nano-clays for the prevention/treatment of COVID-19. Owing to high affinity, nano-clays would capture the viruses before the latter get engaged with human hACE2. In this study, molecular-level simulations and modeling of the interaction of coronavirus spike and hACE2 proteins were performed with and without nano-clays. The results showed a very high level of affinity/cohesiveness among SARS-CoV-2 spike and nano-clays as compared to the one between the former and hACE2. We premise that these nano-clays since already being used as drug carriers could also be injected as "clays-alone" medicine. Recommendations have also been provided for future in vitro and in vivo studies.

Identifiers

PMID32857226
PMCPMC7453700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.