Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32857204›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

Diffusion kurtosis imaging in evaluating gliomas: different region of interest selection methods on time efficiency, measurement repeatability, and diagnostic ability.

Jian-Ping Chu, Yu-Kun Song, Yi-Su Tian, Hai-Shan Qiu, Xia-Hua Huang, Yu-Liang Wang, Ying-Qian Huang, Jing Zhao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Identification of T2W hypointense ring as a novel noninvasive indicator for glioma grade and IDH genotype.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jian-Ping Chu *Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, 58, The Second Zhongshan Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China.
Yu-Kun Song *Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361003, China.
Yi-Su TianDepartment of Radiology, SICHUAN Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Hai-Shan QiuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, 58, The Second Zhongshan Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China.
Xia-Hua HuangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, 58, The Second Zhongshan Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China.
Yu-Liang WangDepartment of Radiology, Shenzhen City Nanshan District People's Hospital, Shenzhen, 518000, China.
Ying-Qian HuangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, 58, The Second Zhongshan Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China.
Jing ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, 58, The Second Zhongshan Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China. zhaojing_sysu@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9270-3250
Sun Yat-sen University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University · CNShenzhen Sixth People's Hospital · CNSichuan Cancer Hospital · CN

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2017A030313676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesComparing the diagnostic efficacy of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) derived from different region of interest (ROI) methods in tumor parenchyma for grading and predicting IDH-1 mutation and 1p19q co-deletion status of glioma patients and correlating with their survival data.

methodsSixty-six patients (29 females; median age, 45 years) with pathologically proved gliomas (low-grade gliomas, 36; high-grade gliomas, 30) were prospectively included, and their clinical data were collected. All patients underwent DKI examination. DKI maps of each metric were derived. Three groups of ROIs (ten spots, ROI-10s; three biggest tumor slices, ROI-3s; and whole-tumor parenchyma, ROI-whole) were manually drawn by two independent radiologists. The interobserver consistency, time spent, diagnostic efficacy, and survival analysis of DKI metrics based on these three ROI methods were analyzed.

resultsThe intraexaminer reliability for all parameters among these three ROI methods was good, and the time spent on ROI-10s was significantly less than that of the other two methods (p < 0.001). DKI based on ROI-10s demonstrated a slightly better diagnostic value than the other two ROI methods for grading and predicting the IDH-1 mutation status of glioma, whereas DKI metrics derived from ROI-10s performed much better than those of the ROI-3s and ROI-whole in identifying 1p19q co-deletion. In survival analysis, the model based on ROI-10s that included patient age and mean diffusivity showed the highest prediction value (C-index, 0.81).

conclusionsAmong the three ROI methods, the ROI-10s method had the least time spent and the best diagnostic value for a comprehensive evaluation of glioma. It is an effective way to process DKI data and has important application value in the clinical evaluation of glioma. KEY POINTS: • The intraexaminer reliability for all DKI parameters among different ROI methods was good, and the time spent on ROI-10 spots was significantly less than the other two ROI methods. • DKI metrics derived from ROI-10 spots performed the best in ROI selection methods (ROI-10s, ten-spot ROIs; ROI-3s, three biggest tumor slices ROI; and ROI-whole, whole-tumor parenchyma ROI) for a comprehensive evaluation of glioma. • The ROI-10 spots method is an effective way to process DKI data and has important application value in the clinical evaluation of glioma.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingDiffusion Tensor ImagingFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingReproducibility of ResultsDiffusion magnetic resonance imagingGliomaIDH1 protein, humanNeoplasm gradingReproducibility of results

Identifiers

PMID32857204
OpenAlexW3082155378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.