ArticleJAMA network open2020
Efficacy and Safety of Antibiotics for Treatment of Scrub Typhus: A Network Meta-analysis.
Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Doxycycline vs azithromycin in patients with scrub typhus: a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Pooled it
- Evaluation of the Therapeutic Effect of Antibiotics on Scrub Typhus: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2022Pooled it
- Exploring OmpA of Orientia tsutsugamushi to design novel multi-epitope vaccine against scrub typhus: an immunoinformatics approach.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Oral Doxycycline, Azithromycin, or Sequential Doxycycline-Azithromycin Treatment for Scrub Typhus.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Scrub Typhus and Influenza A Co-Infection: A Case Report.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Scrub typhus in pregnancy: A 10-year multicenter study in resource-limited settings in China.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
- Pharmacological treatment of postoperative recurrence of Crohn's disease: Protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis.PloS one · 2024Article
- Antibiotic Combination Therapy for Severe Scrub Typhus: Is It Necessary?Infection & chemotherapy · 2023Review
- Pediatric Scrub Typhus Manifesting with Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome: A New Cause for Confusion or Concern-A Case Series.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2022Article
- Open and minimally invasive surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Forty Years of Evidence on the Efficacy and Safety of Oral and Injectable Antibiotics for Treating Lyme Disease of Adults and Children: A Network Meta-Analysis.Microbiology spectrum · 2021Article
- A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Scrub Typhus and its Association with Liver Disease.Journal of global infectious diseasesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Antibiotics have been used for many years to treat scrub typhus, but their efficacy and safety have not been studied thoroughly. Objective: To compare and rank different antibiotics to identify which one can safely eliminate Orientia tsutsugamushi and efficiently alleviate fever in patients with scrub typhus. Data Sources: An electronic search of PubMed and Embase was conducted, from database inception to July 12, 2019. The study was conducted from July 12 to September 2, 2019. Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials and retrospective studies that evaluated the use of antibiotics for treatment in patients diagnosed with scrub typhus caused by O tsutsugamushi were included. Records of articles in English were considered eligible. Studies were assessed independently by 2 reviewers, with disagreement resolved by consensus. Of 6408 studies initially identified, 10 randomized clinical trials and 4 retrospective study met the criteria for further analysis. Data Extraction and Synthesis: This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses extension statement for systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions. Data were independently extracted by 2 reviewers and synthesized with frequentist random-effects network meta-analyses. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was efficacy of the antibiotic, considered as the number of patients who achieved complete healing with an antibiotic. Safety, defined as the prevalence of adverse events associated with the antibiotics, was the secondary outcome, and defervescence time was the tertiary outcome. P scores (scale of 0 to 1, with 1 indicating superiority to other treatments) were used to rank the efficacy, safety, and defeverescence time of the antibiotics. Results: Three searches for articles in Embase and PubMed identified 10 randomized clinical trials (888 participants) and 4 retrospective studies (323 participants) for further analyses. No particular treatment regimen showed a significant advantage or disadvantage with regard to efficacy or safety. However, meta-analysis of retrospective studies indicated that clarithromycin (P score = 0.8730) alleviated fever more efficiently than other antibiotics. Conclusions and Relevance: No treatment regimen reported in this network meta-analysis showed a significant advantage or disadvantage with regard to efficacy or safety. However, clarithromycin might be a better choice than the other drugs for alleviating fever.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.