Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32857103›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2020

A Prediction Method of Visual Field Sensitivity Using Fundus Autofluorescence Images in Patients With Retinitis Pigmentosa.

Tatsuya Inoue, Kosuke Nakajima, Yohei Hashimoto, Shotaro Asano, Kohdai Kitamoto, Kunihiro Azuma, Keiko Azuma, Kazuaki Kadonosono, Ryo Obata, Ryo Asaoka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tatsuya InoueDepartment of Ophthalmology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kosuke NakajimaDepartment of Ophthalmology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yohei HashimotoDepartment of Ophthalmology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Shotaro AsanoDepartment of Ophthalmology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kohdai KitamotoDepartment of Ophthalmology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kunihiro AzumaDepartment of Ophthalmology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Keiko AzumaDepartment of Ophthalmology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuaki KadonosonoDepartment of Ophthalmology and Micro-Technology, Yokohama City University, Kanagawa, Japan.
Ryo ObataDepartment of Ophthalmology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryo AsaokaDepartment of Ophthalmology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between fundus autofluorescence (FAF) and visual field (VF) sensitivities in eyes with retinitis pigmentosa (RP). We also investigated the model we developed to predict VF sensitivity using the FAF ring and its prediction accuracy. Methods: The training dataset consisted of 51 eyes of 28 patients, and the testing dataset consisted of 42 eyes of 25 patients with RP. VF and FAF measurements were conducted using the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) 10-2 test and Optos. The HFA 10-2 test was divided into three sectors according to the association with the FAF (IN, ON, and OUT). Moreover, concentric curves were drawn at 1-degree intervals outside the FAF ring and OUT was divided into six sectors (from OUT1 to OUT6 toward the periphery). Finally, the total deviation (TD) value was predicted using age and visual acuity (VA) in the whole field, and each of the eight sectors was compared. Results: The TD value decreased significantly from IN, ON, and then toward OUT6. The absolute prediction error with the FAF ring (average, 7.6 dB) was significantly smaller than that without the FAF ring (average, 8.7 dB). The absolute prediction error with the FAF ring was significantly smaller in the central areas (IN, 4.4 dB and ON, 5.3 dB) than those in the peripheral areas (OUT1-6, 6.8-9.1 dB). Conclusions: VF sensitivity decreases in association with the FAF ring. We developed a model to predict 10-2 VF sensitivity values using the FAF ring, which enabled us to predict 10-2 TD values.

Indexed as

Optical ImagingVisual FieldsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetinitis PigmentosaRetrospective StudiesVisual Field Tests

Identifiers

PMID32857103
PMCPMC7463201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.