Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32856846›Full record

ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2020

Exploring the Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening through the Lens of Implementers and Beneficiaries of the National Screening Program: A Multi-Contextual Study.

Jyoshma Preema Dsouza, Stephan Van Den Broucke, Sanjay Pattanshetty, William Dhoore

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Barriers in the prevention and early detection of human papillomavirus in Latin America.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. DOST: A consolidated health behavior model that maps factors influencing cancer screening uptake.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Cervical Cancer Screening Services in Nepal: A Descriptive Crosssectional Study.JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jyoshma Preema DsouzaSchool of Public Health, Psychological Research Institute, UCLouvain University of Belgium, Louvain-la-neuve, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5613-6634
Stephan Van Den BrouckeSchool of Public Health, Psychological Research Institute, UCLouvain University of Belgium, Louvain-la-neuve, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9090-8877
Sanjay PattanshettyPrasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2854-2613
William DhooreSchool of Public Health, Psychological Research Institute, UCLouvain University of Belgium, Louvain-la-neuve, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9412-0262
Manipal Academy of Higher Education · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical cancer is a major reason for morbidity and mortality in Low and Middle income countries. The National Programme for Prevention and Control of Cancers, Diabetes, Cardiovascular Diseases and Stroke (NPCDCS) sets out broad national guideline to implement Cervical cancer screening. However, an implementation strategy for cervical cancer screening is not in place for districts. Although opportunistic screening takes place, implementation is hindered by psychological and physical barriers for women, as well as insufficient capacity on the part of implementers. This qualitative study aims to identify the specific barriers that prevent the uptake of cervical cancer screening.

methodsWomen who could benefit from cervical cancer program were interviewed to explore the factors that influenced their uptake of the cervical screening offered. Key informant interviews were conducted with implementers of the NPCDCS and with public health staff of three States (Himachal Pradesh, Meghalaya and Karnataka), to understand their perception of determinants of the utilization of screening services.

resultsThe general health concern among the participants was low, and routine check-ups were considered unimportant. Poor knowledge about cervical cancer, benefits of screening service availability, as well as a general sense of well-being, embarrassment or anxiety related to the screening procedure, fear of being judged for lack of modesty, and stigma were common barriers to screening uptake. In addition to a general unawareness of cervical cancer geographical inaccessibility of screening as a barrier to participate in cervical cancer screening, in certain regions.

conclusionIt is essential to increase the knowledge on cervical cancer and on the benefits of screening among Indian women. Providing information and cues to action by health workers and professionals can facilitate the decision to participate. Implementers need to be involved to ensure context specific implementation of the National programme to overcome these barriers.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Plan ImplementationPatient Acceptance of Health CareAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFocus GroupsFollow-Up StudiesHealth PersonnelHumansMiddle AgedPrognosisQualitative ResearchUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCancer PreventionCervical cancerIndiaLow-middle-income countriesScreening

Identifiers

PMID32856846
PMCPMC7771922
OpenAlexW3082792928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.