Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32856319›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of primatology2020

Validation and utility of a body condition scoring system for chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Lisa A Reamer, Sarah J Neal Webb, Rebekah Jones, Erica Thiele, Rachel L Haller, Steven J Schapiro, Susan P Lambeth, Patrick W Hanley

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of primatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Behavioral Welfare Research for the Management of Sanctuary Chimpanzees (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lisa A ReamerDepartment of Comparative Medicine, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Bastrop, Texas.
Sarah J Neal WebbDepartment of Comparative Medicine, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Bastrop, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-9393-3528
Rebekah JonesCentre Wildlife Care, Port Matilda, Pennsylvania.
Erica ThieleDepartment of Comparative Medicine, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Bastrop, Texas.
Rachel L HallerDepartment of Comparative Medicine, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Bastrop, Texas.
Steven J SchapiroDepartment of Comparative Medicine, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Bastrop, Texas.
Susan P LambethDepartment of Comparative Medicine, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Bastrop, Texas.
Patrick W HanleyRocky Mountain Laboratories, Hamilton, Montana.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USColorado Parks and Wildlife · USUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

The National Center for Chimpanzee CareU42OD011197 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI ABEE, CHRISTIAN R · 2012 to 2019
$19.7M
NIH HHS U42 OD011197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obesity is a problem in captive chimpanzee colonies that can lead to increased risk for disease; therefore, implementation of effective weight management strategies is imperative. To properly implement a weight management program, captive managers should be able to noninvasively identify and assess overweight or obese individuals. Traditional means of categorizing obese individuals involve sedating the animals to obtain body weights or skin fold measurements. The current study aimed to validate a noninvasive, subjective body condition score (BCS) system for captive chimpanzees. The system utilizes a 10-point scale, with one rated as "emaciated," five as "normal," and 10 as "extremely obese." Between 2013 and 2014, 158 chimpanzees were weighed and scored using this system (a) while sedated and (b) while awake in their social group within 1-3 days of sedation ("In-group" ratings). We found high inter-rater reliability between In-group raters, as well as between sedated and In-group scores. BCSs, which require observation only, were significantly positively correlated with weight (an objective measure of obesity often requiring anesthetization), supporting the scale's validity. The BCS system identified 36 individuals as "overweight," while the use of weights alone identified only 26 individuals as "overweight." Furthermore, the BCS system was able to classify individuals of the same sex and weight as having different BCSs, ranging from normal to overweight. Lastly, using focal animal behavioral observations from 2016 to 2018 (N = 120), we found that In-group BCS predicted individual levels of inactive behavior more than 2 years later, demonstrating the predictive validity of the scale. These results illustrate the utility of the BCS system as a noninvasive, reliable, and valid technique that may be more sensitive than traditional methods in identifying and quantifying obesity in chimpanzees. This system can be a useful tool for captive managers to monitor and manage the weight of chimpanzees and other nonhuman primates.

Indexed as

Body CompositionPan troglodytesAnimalsAnimal WelfareBehavior, AnimalBody WeightFemaleMaleObserver VariationOverweightbehavioral managementbody condition scoringchimpanzeeobesitywelfare

Identifiers

PMID32856319
PMCPMC7685522
OpenAlexW3081950944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.