Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32856313›Full record

ArticleJournal of the experimental analysis of behavior2020

Resurgence and downshifts in alternative reinforcement rate.

Timothy A Shahan, Kaitlyn O Browning, Anthony N Nist, Gabrielle M Sutton

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05790668 (Motivational Refinements for Facilitating Reinforcement Schedule Thinning), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05790668 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Motivational Refinements for Facilitating Reinforcement Schedule Thinning

TypeinterventionalSponsorRutgers, The State University of New JerseyRan2023 to 2028Enrolled30ConditionsDecreasing Destructive Behavior, Increasing Functional Communicative BehaviorArmsTraditional Schedule Thinning, PIA-Informed Schedule Thinning, PIA-Informed Schedule Thinning with Competing Stimuli
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Human-operant evaluation of synthesized alternative reinforcement and resurgence.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Resurgence and Behavioral Contrast, Compared and Contrasted.Perspectives on behavior science · 2024
    Article
  9. Examining resurgence in rats following expanded-operant treatments.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Basic and applied research on extinction bursts.Journal of applied behavior analysis · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. A Theory of the Extinction Burst.Perspectives on behavior science · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Phase duration and resurgence.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Timothy A ShahanUtah State University.
Kaitlyn O BrowningUtah State University.
Anthony N NistUtah State University.
Gabrielle M SuttonUtah State University.

Funding

Basic and Clinical Studies in Reinforcing Positive Behaviors in Intellectual and Developmental DisabilitiesR01HD093734 · NICHD · UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Timothy A Shahan · 2018 to 2026
$5.2M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD093734
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resurgence refers to an increase in a previously suppressed target behavior with a relative worsening of conditions for a more recently reinforced alternative behavior. This experiment examined the relation between resurgence and the magnitude of a reduction in the rate of reinforcement for the alternative behavior. Groups of both male and female rats initially pressed a target lever for food on a variable-interval (VI) 30-s schedule. In a second phase, responding to the target lever was extinguished for all groups and pressing an alternative lever was reinforced on a VI 10-s schedule. Next, the rate of reinforcement for alternative behavior was reduced differentially across groups by arranging extinction, VI 80-s, VI 40-s, VI 20-s, or continued VI 10-s reinforcement. Target responding increased as an exponential function of the magnitude of the reduction in alternative reinforcement rates. With the exception that males appeared to show higher rates of target responding in baseline and higher rates of alternative responding in other phases, the overall pattern of responding across phases was not meaningfully different between sexes. The pattern of both target and alternative response rates across sessions and phases was well described quantitatively by the Resurgence as Choice in Context model.

Indexed as

Conditioning, OperantExtinction, PsychologicalAnimalsFemaleFoodMaleRatsReinforcement, PsychologyReinforcement Schedulediscriminationlever pressingmatching lawoperant behaviorratsresurgence

Identifiers

PMID32856313
PMCPMC7755295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.