Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32856269›Full record

ArticleIrish journal of medical science2021

Urological service provision during the COVID-19 period: the experience from an Irish tertiary centre.

Patrick M Collins, Aideen Madden, Clare O'Connell, Shawgi Abdelrazig Omer, Mohammud Shakeel Inder, Rowan G Casey, Robert J Flynn, Arun Z Thomas, Lisa G Smyth, Rustom P Manecksha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Effects of COVID-19 on Cancer Care Provision: A Systematic Review.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Comparative evaluation of 90-day patient outcomes and healthcare encounters following extended day surgery urethroplasty.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Patrick M CollinsDepartment of Urology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3989-7516
Aideen MaddenDepartment of Urology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9068-5426
Clare O'ConnellDepartment of Urology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4142-008X
Shawgi Abdelrazig OmerDepartment of Urology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Mohammud Shakeel InderDepartment of Urology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Rowan G CaseyDepartment of Urology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6910-0219
Robert J FlynnDepartment of Urology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Arun Z ThomasDepartment of Urology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Lisa G SmythDepartment of Urology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Rustom P ManeckshaDepartment of Urology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. rmanecksha@rcsi.ie.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3437-744X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUrological service provision has changed dramatically with the advent of the SARS-CoV-2, necessitating restructuring and reorganization. The aim of this study was to review the reorganization of our unit, map the change in volume of departmental activities and discuss potential solutions.

methodsDepartmental activities over the months of April and May 2020 and 2019 were analysed. Details of admissions, operations, diagnostic procedures, outpatient reviews, morbidities and mortalities were recorded. Operations were performed on two sites, with elective operation transferred to an offsite, COVID-free hospital.

resultsSeventy-four emergency operations were performed onsite, with 85 elective operations outsourced. A total of 159 operations were performed, compared with 280 in the same period in 2019. Five (5.0%) of 101 admitted patients to the COVID hospital contracted COVID-19. No patients outsourced to the COVID-free hospital were infected there. Outpatient referrals to urology service decreased from 928 to 481. There was a 66% decrease in new cancer diagnoses. A virtual review clinic was established, with remaining outpatients reviewed through a telephone clinic platform.

conclusionCompared with 2019, we performed fewer operations and outpatient procedures, had fewer admissions and diagnosed fewer patients with new cancers. However, outsourcing elective operation to designated non-COVID hospitals prevented the infection of any patient with COVID-19 in the post-operative period. The use of virtual clinic and telephone clinic has had some success in replacing traditional outpatient visits. The overall significant decrease in operative volume will likely precipitate a mismatch between demand and service provision in the coming months, unless capacity is increased.

Indexed as

COVID-19FemaleHumansInfection ControlIrelandMaleSARS-CoV-2Tertiary Care CentersUrologic DiseasesUrologyUrology Department, HospitalCoronavirusCOVID-19SARS-CoV-2Service provisionUrology

Identifiers

PMID32856269
PMCPMC7451224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.