Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32856210›Full record

GuidelineSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2020

Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) 2020 clinical practice recommendations for the management of severe gastrointestinal and hepatic toxicities from checkpoint inhibitors.

Michael Dougan, Ada G Blidner, Jennifer Choi, Tim Cooksley, Ilya Glezerman, Pamela Ginex, Monica Girotra, Dipti Gupta, Douglas Johnson, Vickie R Shannon and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readHistorical ArticlePractice GuidelineReview
In one paragraph

Guideline in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. High Grade Hepatotoxicity From Dual Checkpoint Inhibitors Is More Common in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Than Other Cancers.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Function ofEJNMMI reports · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. PD-1 Blockade Induces Reactivation of Nonproductive T-Cell Responses Characterized by NF-κB Signaling in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Hepatobiliary complications of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

Michael DouganMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Ada G BlidnerLaboratory of Immunopathology, Institute of Biology and Experimental Medicine-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Jennifer ChoiDivision of Oncodermatology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Tim CooksleyTim Cooksley, Manchester University Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Ilya GlezermanRenal Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Pamela GinexOncology Nursing Society, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Monica GirotraEndocrine Division, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Dipti GuptaDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Douglas JohnsonDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center and Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Vickie R ShannonDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Maria Suarez-AlmazorSection of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Ronald AndersonDepartment of Immunology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, PO Box 667, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa.
Bernardo L RapoportDepartment of Immunology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, PO Box 667, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa. bernardo.rapoport@up.ac.za.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7610-3653
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARHarvard University · USNorthwestern University · USOncology Nursing Society · USThe Medical Oncology Centre of Rosebank · ZAUniversity of Manchester · GBUniversity of Pretoria · ZAVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune-related adverse events (IrAEs) affecting the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and liver are among the most frequent and most severe inflammatory toxicities from contemporary immunotherapy. Inflammation of the colon and or small intestines (entero)colitis is the single most common GI IrAE and is an important cause of delay of discontinuation of immunotherapy. The severity of these GI IrAEs can range from manageable with symptomatic treatment alone to life-threatening complications, including perforation and liver failure. The frequency and severity of GI IrAEs is dependent on the specific immunotherapy given, with cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen (CTLA)-4 blockade more likely to induce severe GI IrAEs than blockade of either programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or PD-1 ligand (PD-L1), and combination therapy showing the highest rate of GI IrAEs, particularly in the liver. To date, we have minimal prospective data on the appropriate diagnosis and management of GI IrAEs, and recommendations are based largely on retrospective data and expert opinion. Although clinical diagnoses of GI IrAEs are common, biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosis of both immunotherapy-induced enterocolitis and hepatitis and can play an important role in excluding competing, though less common, diagnoses and ensuring optimal management. GI IrAEs typically respond to high-dose corticosteroids, though a significant fraction of patients requires secondary immune suppression. For colitis, both TNF-α blockade with infliximab and integrin inhibition with vedolizumab have proved highly effective in corticosteroid-refractory cases. Detailed guidelines have been published for the management of low-grade GI IrAEs. In the setting of more severe toxicities, involvement of a GI specialist is generally recommended. The purpose of this review is to survey the available literature and provide management recommendations focused on the GI specialist.

Indexed as

Chemical and Drug Induced Liver InjuryCTLA-4 AntigenGastrointestinal DiseasesHistory, 21st CenturyHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunologic FactorsImmunotherapyInternational AgenciesNeoplasmsPalliative CarePalliative MedicineProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorSeverity of Illness IndexSocieties, MedicalCTLA-4 AntigenCTLA4 protein, humanImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunologic FactorsProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorCheckpoint blockadeColitisEnterocolitisGastrointestinal immune-related adverse eventsHepatitisImmune-related adverse eventsImmunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID32856210
PMCPMC8507388
OpenAlexW3082951021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.