Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32856160›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2021

Data extraction for epidemiological research (DExtER): a novel tool for automated clinical epidemiology studies.

Krishna Margadhamane Gokhale, Joht Singh Chandan, Konstantinos Toulis, Georgios Gkoutos, Peter Tino, Krishnarajah Nirantharakumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Krishna Margadhamane GokhaleSchool of Computer Science, College of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B152TT, UK. K.M.Gokhale@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2167-9572
Joht Singh ChandanInstitute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B152TT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9561-5141
Konstantinos ToulisInstitute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B152TT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2044-4253
Georgios GkoutosChair of Clinical Bioinformatics, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B152TT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2061-091X
Peter TinoSchool of Computer Science, College of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B152TT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2330-128X
Krishnarajah NirantharakumarInstitute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B152TT, UK. k.nirantharan@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6816-1279

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S003878/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of primary care electronic health records for research is abundant. The benefits gained from utilising such records lies in their size, longitudinal data collection and data quality. However, the use of such data to undertake high quality epidemiological studies, can lead to significant challenges particularly in dealing with misclassification, variation in coding and the significant effort required to pre-process the data in a meaningful format for statistical analysis. In this paper, we describe a methodology to aid with the extraction and processing of such databases, delivered by a novel software programme; the "Data extraction for epidemiological research" (DExtER). The basis of DExtER relies on principles of extract, transform and load processes. The tool initially provides the ability for the healthcare dataset to be extracted, then transformed in a format whereby data is normalised, converted and reformatted. DExtER has a user interface designed to obtain data extracts specific to each research question and observational study design. There are facilities to input the requirements for; eligible study period, definition of exposed and unexposed groups, outcome measures and important baseline covariates. To date the tool has been utilised and validated in a multitude of settings. There have been over 35 peer-reviewed publications using the tool, and DExtER has been implemented as a validated public health surveillance tool for obtaining accurate statistics on epidemiology of key morbidities. Future direction of this work will be the application of the framework to linked as well as international datasets and the development of standardised methods for conducting electronic pre-processing and extraction from datasets for research purposes.

Indexed as

Data AccuracyData ManagementEpidemiologic Research DesignHumansComputer scienceEpidemiologyExtractLoadObservational studyResearch methodsTransform

Identifiers

PMID32856160
PMCPMC7987616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.