ArticleHNO2021
[New ways in hearing rehabilitation after cochlear implantation].
Article in HNO, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of perceived competence in remote cochlear implant aftercare: a mixed-methods study.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Incorporating an Intelligent Tutoring System Into a Game-Based Auditory Rehabilitation Training for Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients: Algorithm Development and Validation.JMIR serious games · 2024Article
- Article
- Algorithm-Based Hearing and Speech Therapy Rehabilitation after Cochlear Implantation.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAfter cochlear implantation, auditory and speech training is usually necessary. Up until now, this has been performed on an out- or inpatient basis in direct contact with a therapist. Due to technical advances but also particularly because of an increasing use of digital media and a desire for mobility and independence, the demand for digital training programs is increasing in the field of hearing rehabilitation. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn a first step, the most important elements of auditory training were determined on the basis of commonly used auditory and speech processing models, and the core features of a computer-based teletherapeutic hearing platform were defined. This process considered motivational elements and adaptive mechanisms as regularly used in educational and speech and language therapy. In a second step, an initial prototype of the "train2hear" teletherapeutic hearing platform was developed by an interdisciplinary research team.
resultsThe core of the train2hear platform is an initial analysis according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF), on the basis of which an individual training plan is designed. Various adaptive mechanisms enable the level of difficulty to be continually adapted to the individual user's learning progress. A videoconference tool enables contact between the patient and the therapist.
conclusionThe train2hear platform represents a first prototype of a computer-based auditory rehabilitation program in German. Further evaluation and development in a clinical study are needed to determine the feasibility and efficacy of the platform.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.