Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32856097›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of surgery2021

Posterior Retroperitoneoscopic Versus Laparoscopic Transperitoneal Adrenalectomy: A Systematic Review by an Updated Meta-Analysis.

Paschalis Gavriilidis, Christian Camenzuli, Anna Paspala, Aimee N Di Marco, Fausto F Palazzo

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. [Surgical treatment of pheochromocytoma].Problemy endokrinologii · 2023
    Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Adrenal cysts: an emerging condition.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2023
    Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paschalis GavriilidisDepartment of Endocrine and Thyroid Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 OHS, UK. pgavrielidis@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7773-2291
Christian CamenzuliDepartment of Endocrine and Thyroid Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 OHS, UK.
Anna PaspalaDepartment of HPB Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 OHS, UK.
Aimee N Di MarcoDepartment of Endocrine and Thyroid Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 OHS, UK.
Fausto F PalazzoDepartment of Endocrine and Thyroid Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 OHS, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTwo main minimal access adrenalectomy techniques are available: laparoscopic transperitoneal (LTA) and posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (PRA). This study aims to compare these approaches in an updated meta-analysis of randomised controlled (RCT) and non-randomised comparative (NRT) trials.

methodsA systematic search of comparative LTA and PRA studies was performed. Standard demographic and surgical data were recorded. Outcome measures compared included: operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), conversion to open, post-operative pain, time to oral intake and ambulation, early morbidity, hospital length of stay (HLOS) and mortality. Quality of RCTs and NRTs was assessed using Cochrane and ROBINS-I, respectively, and heterogeneity using the I

resultsFollowing exclusions, 12 studies were included in the analysis: 3 RCTs and 9 NRTs. These reported a total of 775 patients: 341 (44%) PRA and 434 (56%) LTA. Demographics were similar except for tumour size which was smaller (by 0.78 cm) in PRA (p = 0.003). Significant differences in outcome were seen in EBL (18 mls less in PRA, p = 0.006), time to oral intake (3.4 h sooner in PRA p = 0.009) and HLOS (shorter in PRA by 0.84 day, p = 0.001).

conclusionsThis analysis demonstrates that while PRA tends to be performed for smaller tumours it allows for less EBL, earlier post-operative oral intake and shorter hospital stays. In appropriately selected patients, it represents an invaluable tool in the endocrine surgeon's armamentarium.

Indexed as

Adrenal Gland NeoplasmsLaparoscopyAdrenalectomyHumansLength of StayOperative TimePeritoneal CavityRetroperitoneal Space

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.