ReviewHealth promotion international2021
Corporate social responsibility and internal stakeholders' health and well-being in Europe: a systematic descriptive review.
Review in Health promotion international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Corporate social responsibility and workplace health promotion: A systematic review.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Pooled it
- ESG performance, financing constraints, and workplace health investment: evidence from Chinese biopharmaceutical enterprises.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Effects of internal and external corporate social responsibility on employee job satisfaction during a pandemic: A medical device industry perspective.European management journal · 2023Article
- Exploring Transfer Potentials of the IMPROVEInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Internal Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee Burnout: An Employee Management Perspective from the Healthcare Sector.Psychology research and behavior management · 2023Article
- Influence of Narcissistic CEOs on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Choices: The Moderating Role of the Legal Environment.Psychology research and behavior management · 2023Article
- Internal Corporate Policy: CSR and Employee Satisfaction.Employee responsibilities and rights journal · 2023Article
- The Role of Social Responsibility and Ethics in Employees' Wellbeing.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Social responsibility and subjective well-being of volunteers for COVID-19: The mediating role of job involvement.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Improving the Environmental Footprint through Employees: A Case of Female Leaders from the Perspective of CSR.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Interfaces of occupational health management and corporate social responsibility: a multi-centre qualitative study from Germany.BMC public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) can contribute to the triple bottom line of economic, social and environmental performance in organizations. However, the relationship between CSR, employee health and well-being has not been frequently assessed despite an increased awareness that this relationship can contribute to sustainable workplaces. To identify studies addressing the relationship between CSR and employee health and well-being within the EuCIropean context, we conducted a systematic literature search using Web of Science and Medline. Of the 60 articles screened for inclusion, 16 were retained. The results suggest that the majority (n = 14) of the identified studies aimed to understand the impact of CSR strategies on employees' job satisfaction. None of the studies investigated the relationship between internal CSR and physical health. There was no clarity in the measurement of either internal CSR or the extent to which it affected employee outcomes. There is a need for consensus on measurement of internal CSR and of the health and well-being-related outcomes. Public health and occupational health researchers should be part of the discussion on the potential role of CSR in physical and psychological health outcomes beyond job satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.