Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32856049›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2021

Trypanosoma brucei gambiense-iELISA: A Promising New Test for the Post-Elimination Monitoring of Human African Trypanosomiasis.

Manon Geerts, Nick Van Reet, Sander Leyten, Raf Berghmans, Kat S Rock, Theresa H T Coetzer, Lauren E-A Eyssen, Philippe Büscher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Two-Year Follow-Up ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Manon GeertsDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Nick Van ReetDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Sander LeytenAdvanced Practical Diagnostics BVBA, Turnhout, Belgium.
Raf BerghmansAdvanced Practical Diagnostics BVBA, Turnhout, Belgium.
Kat S RockMathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Theresa H T CoetzerSchool of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
Lauren E-A EyssenSchool of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
Philippe BüscherDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerpen, Belgium.

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1174221
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization targeted Trypanosoma brucei gambiense human African trypanosomiasis (gHAT) for elimination as a public health problem and for elimination of transmission. To measure gHAT elimination success with prevalences close to zero, highly specific diagnostics are necessary. Such a test exists in the form of an antibody-mediated complement lysis test, the trypanolysis test, but biosafety issues and technological requirements prevent its large-scale use. We developed an inhibition ELISA with high specificity and sensitivity that is applicable in regional laboratories in gHAT endemic countries.

methodsThe T. b. gambiense inhibition ELISA (g-iELISA) is based on the principle that binding of monoclonal antibodies to specific epitopes of T. b. gambiense surface glycoproteins can be inhibited by circulating antibodies of gHAT patients directed against the same epitopes. Using trypanolysis as reference test, the diagnostic accuracy of the g-iELISA was evaluated on plasma samples from 739 gHAT patients and 619 endemic controls and on dried blood spots prepared with plasma of 95 gHAT and 37 endemic controls.

resultsOverall sensitivity and specificity on plasma were, respectively, 98.0% (95% CI 96.7-98.9) and 99.5% (95% CI 98.6-99.9). With dried blood spots, sensitivity was 92.6% (95% CI 85.4-97.0), and specificity was 100% (95% CI 90.5-100.0). The g-iELISA is stable for at least 8 months when stored at 2-8°C.

conclusionThe g-iELISA might largely replace trypanolysis for monitoring gHAT elimination and for postelimination surveillance. The g-iELISA kit is available for evaluation in reference laboratories in endemic countries.

Indexed as

Trypanosoma brucei gambienseTrypanosomiasis, AfricanAnimalsHumansPrevalencePublic HealthSensitivity and SpecificitydiagnosiseliminationELISATrypanosoma brucei gambiense

Identifiers

PMID32856049
PMCPMC8563279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.