ArticleApplied materials today2020
3D Printing metamaterials towards tissue engineering.
Article in Applied materials today, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterization of 2D PLA Structural Metamaterials-Methodology and Challenges for Properties Assessment.Polymers · 2026Article
- A strategy of 3D-printed Ta4C3 MXenes nanohydroxyapatite/methacryloylated silk fibroin scaffolds for postsurgical management of osteosarcoma.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Article
- Bioinspired, Rapidly Responsive Magnetically Tunable Stiffness Metamaterials.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Article
- Clinical Application of 3D-Printed Custom Hemipelvic Prostheses With Negative Poisson's Ratio Porous Structures in Reconstruction After Resection of Pelvic Malignant Tumors.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Article
- AI-driven 3D bioprinting for regenerative medicine: From bench to bedside.Bioactive materials · 2025Review
- Blueprints of Architected Materials: A Guide to Metamaterial Design for Tissue Engineering.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2024Review
- Design considerations for digital light processing bioprinters.Applied physics reviews · 2024Review
- Recent Progress in 3D Printing of Polymer Materials as Soft Actuators and Robots.Chem & bio engineering · 2024Review
- Point-of-Need Additive Manufacturing in Austere Arctic Environments: An Evaluation of Medical Logistics Requirements and Capabilities Demonstration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- 4D-Printable Photocrosslinkable Polyurethane-Based Inks for Tissue Scaffold and Actuator Applications.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2024Article
- Bulk-Material Bond Strength Exists in Extrusion Additive Manufacturing for a Wide Range of Temperatures, Speeds, and Layer Times.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2023Article
- Ink Material Selection and Optical Design Considerations in DLP 3D Printing.Applied materials today · 2023Article
- Recent Developments in 3D Bio-Printing and Its Biomedical Applications.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- 3D printing of bio-instructive materials: Toward directing the cell.Bioactive materials · 2023Article
- Cell encapsulation in gelatin methacryloyl bioinks impairs microscale diffusion properties.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Biomolecule-Based Optical Metamaterials: Design and Applications.Biosensors · 2022Review
- Ink Rheology Regulates Stability of Bioprinted Strands.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2022Article
- Digital Light Processing Bioprinting Advances for Microtissue Models.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2022Review
- Multi-material digital light processing bioprinting of hydrogel-based microfluidic chips.Biofabrication · 2021Article
- Applications of additive manufacturing (AM) in sustainable energy generation and battle against COVID-19 pandemic: The knowledge evolution of 3D printing.Journal of manufacturing systems · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid growth and disruptive potentials of three-dimensional (3D) printing demand further research for addressing fundamental fabrication concepts and enabling engineers to realize the capabilities of 3D printing technologies. There is a trend to use these capabilities to develop materials that derive some of their properties via their structural organization rather than their intrinsic constituents, sometimes referred to as mechanical metamaterials. Such materials show qualitatively different mechanical behaviors despite using the same material composition, such as ultra-lightweight, super-elastic, and auxetic structures. In this work, we review current advancements in the design and fabrication of multi-scale advanced structures with properties heretofore unseen in well-established materials. We classify the fabrication methods as conventional methods, additive manufacturing techniques, and 4D printing. Following a comprehensive comparison of different fabrication methods, we suggest some guidelines on the selection of fabrication parameters to construct meta-biomaterials for tissue engineering. The parameters include multi-material capacity, fabrication resolution, prototyping speed, and biological compatibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.