Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32855854›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2020

Clinical Application of Infrared-Light Microperimetry in the Assessment of Scotopic-Eye Sensitivity.

Grzegorz Łabuz, Asu Rayamajhi, Julia Usinger, Katarzyna Komar, Patrick Merz, Ramin Khoramnia, Grazyna Palczewska, Krzysztof Palczewski, Gerd U Auffarth

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pupillary Light Reflex Induced by Two-Photon Vision.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2021
    Article
  11. Two-photon microperimetry with picosecond pulses.Biomedical optics express · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Grzegorz ŁabuzThe David J. Apple Center for Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Asu RayamajhiThe David J. Apple Center for Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Julia UsingerThe David J. Apple Center for Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Katarzyna KomarInstitute of Physics, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy and Informatics, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland.
Patrick MerzThe David J. Apple Center for Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ramin KhoramniaThe David J. Apple Center for Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Grazyna PalczewskaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Gavin Herbert Eye Institute, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
Krzysztof PalczewskiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Gavin Herbert Eye Institute, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
Gerd U AuffarthThe David J. Apple Center for Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DECleveland Medical Devices · USInstitute of Physics · PLUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

A two-photon ophthalmoscope for human retinal imaging and functional testingU01EY025451 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI PALCZEWSKI, KRZYSZTOF · 2015 to 2019
$3.2M
NEI NIH HHS U01 EY025451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The eye can see pulsed near-infrared (IR) radiation with the color corresponding to half of the wavelength used. Until recently, the technology required for measuring IR vision was confined to optical laboratories and was not studied clinically. The current investigation sought to determine the values for IR thresholds in a healthy population. Methods: IR-light threshold was measured in 45 healthy participants, aged from 21 to 70 years. Ten patients with retinal pathology were included for comparison. Ocular media clarity was assessed with a straylight parameter. The sensitivity of dark-adapted eyes (expressed on a 0-26 dB scale) were tested using an IR microperimeter. The device consists of a femtosecond laser that emits 1045 nm light to project a stimulus at the retina. Results: All participants were able to see the IR stimulus, which they perceived as green, and all performed the test. Measurements at seven locations revealed lower sensitivity at the fovea (15.5 dB) than in paracentral regions (18.2 dB). We noted a significant straylight increase with age. Although, in our study population, it was only a slight, -0.18 dB decline per decade of the average IR-sensitivity. The retinal-pathology group demonstrated impaired sensitivity to IR light. Conclusions: We showed that IR-light sensitivity does not significantly decrease with age despite a straylight increase. A reference level for the IR threshold was proposed. The application of IR-light microperimetry can be extended to the assessment of retinal pathology. Translational Relevance: IR-light microperimetry could be applied clinically to measure visual function.

Indexed as

RetinaVisual Field TestsAdultAgedFovea CentralisHumansMiddle AgedVision, OcularYoung AdultagingIR thresholdscotopic sensitivitystraylight

Identifiers

PMID32855854
PMCPMC7422764
OpenAlexW3038929327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.