Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32855844›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2020

Cone Identification in Choroideremia: Repeatability, Reliability, and Automation Through Use of a Convolutional Neural Network.

Jessica I W Morgan, Min Chen, Andrew M Huang, Yu You Jiang, Robert F Cooper

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. ƒ(Cell): Software for Reproducible Analysis of Optoretinograms.Translational vision science & technology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica I W MorganScheie Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Min ChenDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Andrew M HuangScheie Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Yu You JiangScheie Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Robert F CooperScheie Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
University of Pennsylvania · USMarquette University · US

Funding

Scientific TransparencyP30EY001583 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Qi N Cui · 1985 to 2026
$19.5M
Platform Technologies for Microscopic Retinal Imaging: Development & TranslationU01EY025477 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DUBRA, ALFREDO · 2015 to 2019
$4.4M
Retinal structure, function and response to gene therapyR01EY028601 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Jessica I.W. Morgan · 2018 to 2026
$3.6M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001583NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028601NEI NIH HHS U01 EY025477
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Adaptive optics imaging has enabled the visualization of photoreceptors both in health and disease. However, there remains a need for automated accurate cone photoreceptor identification in images of disease. Here, we apply an open-source convolutional neural network (CNN) to automatically identify cones in images of choroideremia (CHM). We further compare the results to the repeatability and reliability of manual cone identifications in CHM. Methods: We used split-detection adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy to image the inner segment cone mosaic of 17 patients with CHM. Cones were manually identified twice by one experienced grader and once by two additional experienced graders in 204 regions of interest (ROIs). An open-source CNN either pre-trained on normal images or trained on CHM images automatically identified cones in the ROIs. True and false positive rates and Dice's coefficient were used to determine the agreement in cone locations between data sets. Interclass correlation coefficient was used to assess agreement in bound cone density. Results: Intra- and intergrader agreement for cone density is high in CHM. CNN performance increased when it was trained on CHM images in comparison to normal, but had lower agreement than manual grading. Conclusions: Manual cone identifications and cone density measurements are repeatable and reliable for images of CHM. CNNs show promise for automated cone selections, although additional improvements are needed to equal the accuracy of manual measurements. Translational Relevance: These results are important for designing and interpreting longitudinal studies of cone mosaic metrics in disease progression or treatment intervention in CHM.

Indexed as

ChoroideremiaRetinal Cone Photoreceptor CellsAutomationHumansNeural Networks, ComputerReproducibility of Resultsadaptive opticschoroideremiaconesconvolutional neural network

Identifiers

PMID32855844
PMCPMC7424931
OpenAlexW3042942677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.