ArticleJournal of surgical case reports2020
Tips for operation of inguinal hernia after implantation of artificial urinary sphincter following radical prostatectomy: report of two cases.
Article in Journal of surgical case reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcomes of inguinal hernia repair after implantation of preperitoneal reservoir for artificial urinary sphincter or penile implant.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Inguinal hernia repair in patients with artificial urinary sphincter after radical prostatectomy.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urinary incontinence is one of the common complications after radical prostatectomy along with inguinal hernia. Artificial urethral sphincter implantation is widely accepted as a treatment option. We report two surgical cases of inguinal hernia after artificial urethral sphincter implantation for urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy. In Case 1, since the device went through the inguinal canal, adhesion around the pubis was extremely hard. In Case 2, the device was placed on the ventral side of the rectus abdominis muscle, so it was operable almost as normal. In each case, the surgical procedure was considered carefully after confirming the location of the device by preoperative computed tomography and ultrasonography. Hernia repair was successfully performed using the Lichtenstein method. There are few reports regarding surgical repair of inguinal hernia following artificial urinary sphincter implantation. Preoperative image and appropriate choice of approach could facilitate safe and secure surgery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.