ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2020
PCR coupled to electrospray ionization mass spectrometry for microbiological diagnosis and surveillance of ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Clinical application of targeted next-generation sequencing in pneumonia diagnosis among cancer patients.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Immunosuppressed Patients.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Prevention and treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia in COVID-19.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Etiological diagnosis is essential for anti-infective therapy in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). The present study aimed to evaluate the capacity of sequential PCR coupled to electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (PCR/ESI-MS) tests as a rapid diagnostic technique for patients with VAP. A total of 12 patients diagnosed with VAP were enrolled at the intensive care unit in Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University. Mini-bronchoalveolar lavage fluid specimens were prospectively collected on VAP 0, 5 and 10 days following the beginning of mechanical ventilation. Routine clinical culture and PCR/ESI-MS were compared for identification of microorganisms in the specimens. A total of 51 bacterial species were detected by either of the two methods. The positive rates of routine clinical culture and PCR/ESI-MS were 38.2 and 88.2%, respectively. Out of the 16 specimens positive in routine cultures, 15 were also positive on PCR/ESI-MS, except for one, from which a mix of three distinct bacterial isolates were reported by culture. Among the 50 bacterial species identified by PCR/ESI-MS, 15 (35.7%) of the common VAP pathogens were confirmed by paired culture. Furthermore, of the 16 bacterial isolates that were finally confirmed to be responsible for VAP, 14 were identified by a sequential PCR/ESI-MS test concurrently when the culture results were obtained. PCR/ESI-MS identified pathogens that may cause VAP in 8 subjects prior to the occurrence of associated clinical manifestations. To conclude, PCR/ESI-MS was a potential rapid technique for diagnosis of VAP within 6 h. Regular respiratory specimen monitoring using PCR/ESI-MS provides information for selecting appropriate and adequate antibiotic therapies in ventilated patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.