ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2020
Advantages of 16S rRNA PCR for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Periprosthetic Infections with the BioFireBiomedicines · 2024Review
- Detecting and Monitoring Periprosthetic Joint Infection by Using Electrical Bioimpedance Spectroscopy: A Preliminary Case Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Surveillance of osteoarticular infections caused byFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) PCR has been reported to be an effective diagnostic means in patients with prosthetic joint infection (PJI). The aim of the present meta-analysis is to establish the overall diagnostic accuracy of the measurement of 16S rRNA PCR for diagnosing PJI. PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Wiley Online Library were searched for studies on 16S rRNA PCR in the diagnosis of PJI. The search incorporated all literature published up until December 2018 and the QUADAS-2 checklist were used for quality assessment. The sensitivity, specificity and other measures of accuracy of 16S rRNA PCR in the diagnosis of PJI were pooled. Statistical analysis was performed by employing Meta-Disc 1.4 and Stata 12.0 software. A total of 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. The summary estimates for 16S rRNA PCR in the diagnosis of PJI in these studies were pooled: Sensitivity, 0.70 (95% CI, 0.67-0.73); specificity, 0.93 (95% CI, 0.91-0.94); positive likelihood ratio, 10.93 (95% CI, 5.55-21.51); negative likelihood ratio, 0.33 (95% CI, 0.28-0.40); diagnostic odds ratio, 41.77 (95% CI, 19.90-87.68); and the area under the curve, 0.89. Subgroup analysis showed that the use of sonicate fluid and periprosthetic tissue has higher sensitivity (0.76; 95% CI, 0.69-0.82; and 0.73; 95% CI, 0.68-0.78, respectively), specificity (0.93, 95% CI, 0.90-0.96; and 0.95; 95% CI, 0.90-0.98, respectively) and area under the curve (0.93 and 0.98, respectively). 16S rRNA PCR assay plays an important role in the diagnosis of PJI. The results of 16S rRNA PCR assays should be interpreted in parallel with clinical findings, the results of microbiological, and other laboratory tests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.