Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32855509›Full record

ReviewPediatric research2020

Human milk fortification: the clinician and parent perspectives.

Amy B Hair, Joanne Ferguson, Cristal Grogan, Jae H Kim, Sarah N Taylor

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amy B HairSection of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA. abhair@texaschildrens.org.
Joanne FergusonSpecial Interest Group in Necrotizing Enterocolitis™, Poole, UK.
Cristal GroganNICU Parent Network, Madison, MS, USA.
Jae H KimDivision of Neonatology, Perinatal Institute, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Sarah N TaylorDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study reports on the human milk fortification session at the 2019 NEC Society Symposium, which included clinicians and parents discussing the evidence comparing fortification options such as efficacy, safety, cost effectiveness, and the need for parents to be informed about fortifier choice. With the current literature available and the varying standard of care practices for human milk fortification, further studies are needed to determine the most complete diet for preterm infants. The optimal diet would not only provide key nutrients and energy for growth and development, but also improve short- and long-term outcomes. Parents, as advocates and providers for their infant, should be informed, educated, and included in the discussion and decisions regarding fortification of human milk for their infant.

Indexed as

Milk, HumanAttitude of Health PersonnelDietDietary SupplementsEnterocolitis, NecrotizingFamilyFemaleFood, FortifiedHumansInfant FormulaInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Very Low Birth WeightNutrientsWeight GainNutrients

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.