Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32855305›Full record

ReviewGut2021

DNA damage repair as a target in pancreatic cancer: state-of-the-art and future perspectives.

Lukas Perkhofer, Johann Gout, Elodie Roger, Fernando Kude de Almeida, Carolina Baptista Simões, Lisa Wiesmüller, Thomas Seufferlein, Alexander Kleger

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gut, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 113 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
113citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

113 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 196 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Homologous Recombination Deficiency in Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Prevalence Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. GSK3βGut · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. DNA Damage and Repair in Pancreatic Cancer-The Latest Findings.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Lukas PerkhoferDepartment of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0484-0974
Johann GoutDepartment of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0522-9800
Elodie RogerDepartment of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4930-6292
Fernando Kude de AlmeidaUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Carolina Baptista SimõesHospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar De Lisboa Norte E.P.E. (CHLN), Gastroenterology, Lisboa, Portugal.
Lisa WiesmüllerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Thomas Seufferlein *Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany thomas.seufferlein@uniklinik-ulm.de.
Alexander Kleger *Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0592-5232
University Hospital Ulm · DEHospital de Santa Maria · PTUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre · BRUniversität Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complex rearrangement patterns and mitotic errors are hallmarks of most pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC), a disease with dismal prognosis despite some therapeutic advances in recent years. DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) bear the greatest risk of provoking genomic instability, and DNA damage repair (DDR) pathways are crucial in preserving genomic integrity following a plethora of damage types. Two major repair pathways dominate DSB repair for safeguarding the genome integrity: non-homologous end joining and homologous recombination (HR). Defective HR, but also alterations in other DDR pathways, such as

Indexed as

DNA RepairAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalDNA DamageForecastingHumansPhthalazinesPiperazinesAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorolaparibPhthalazinesPiperazineschemotherapyDNA damagepancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID32855305
PMCPMC7873425
OpenAlexW3080980743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.