Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32854996›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of arthroplasty2021

Automated Detection of Periprosthetic Joint Infections and Data Elements Using Natural Language Processing.

Sunyang Fu, Cody C Wyles, Douglas R Osmon, Martha L Carvour, Elham Sagheb, Taghi Ramazanian, Walter K Kremers, David G Lewallen, Daniel J Berry, Sunghwan Sohn and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of arthroplasty, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sunyang FuDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; The University of Minnesota - Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN.
Cody C WylesDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Douglas R OsmonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Martha L CarvourDepartment of Internal Medicine, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
Elham SaghebDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Taghi RamazanianDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Walter K KremersDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
David G LewallenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Daniel J BerryDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Sunghwan SohnDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Hilal Maradit KremersDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USUniversity of Iowa · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Resource CoreP30AR076312 · NIAMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Daniel Berry · 2019 to 2026
$5.5M
Precision Orthopedics: Multimodal Data Infrastructure for Personalized Surgical Decisions in Joint ArthroplastyR01AR073147 · NIAMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Hilal Maradit Kremers · 2018 to 2026
$3.5M
NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR076312NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR073147
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeriprosthetic joint infection (PJI) data elements are contained in both structured and unstructured documents in electronic health records and require manual data collection. The goal of this study is to develop a natural language processing (NLP) algorithm to replicate manual chart review for PJI data elements.

methodsPJI was identified among all total joint arthroplasty (TJA) procedures performed at a single academic institution between 2000 and 2017. Data elements that comprise the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria were manually extracted and used as the gold standard for validation. A training sample of 1208 TJA surgeries (170 PJI cases) was randomly selected to develop the prototype NLP algorithms and an additional 1179 surgeries (150 PJI cases) were randomly selected as the test sample. The algorithms were applied to all consultation notes, operative notes, pathology reports, and microbiology reports to predict the correct status of PJI based on MSIS criteria.

resultsThe algorithm, which identified patients with PJI based on MSIS criteria, achieved an f1-score (harmonic mean of precision and recall) of 0.911. Algorithm performance in extracting the presence of sinus tract, purulence, pathologic documentation of inflammation, and growth of cultured organisms from the involved TJA achieved f1-scores that ranged from 0.771 to 0.982, sensitivity that ranged from 0.730 to 1.000, and specificity that ranged from 0.947 to 1.000.

conclusionNLP-enabled algorithms have the potential to automate data collection for PJI diagnostic elements, which could directly improve patient care and augment cohort surveillance and research efforts. Further validation is needed in other hospital settings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Diagnostic.

Indexed as

Arthritis, InfectiousProsthesis-Related InfectionsArthroplastyElectronic Health RecordsHumansNatural Language Processingartificial intelligenceelectronic health recordsnatural language processingperiprosthetic joint infectiontotal joint arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID32854996
PMCPMC7855617
OpenAlexW3047431235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.