Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32854749›Full record

Observational studyJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2020

The relationship between ACL reconstruction and meniscal repair: quality of life, sports return, and meniscal failure rate-2- to 12-year follow-up.

Juan M Rodríguez-Roiz, Sergi Sastre-Solsona, Dragos Popescu, Jordi Montañana-Burillo, Andres Combalia-Aleu

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Long-Term Results for Meniscus Repair.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Surgical Management of Traumatic Meniscus Injuries.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Juan M Rodríguez-RoizOrthopedic & Trauma Surgery Dept, Hospital Clínic, C/Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain. jmleon42@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8051-923X
Sergi Sastre-SolsonaOrthopedic & Trauma Surgery Dept, Hospital Clínic, C/Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Dragos PopescuOrthopedic & Trauma Surgery Dept, Hospital Clínic, C/Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Jordi Montañana-BurilloOrthopedic & Trauma Surgery Dept, Hospital Clínic, C/Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Andres Combalia-AleuOrthopedic & Trauma Surgery Dept, Hospital Clínic, C/Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESClínica Rementería · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFew studies have approached in a long-term follow-up of meniscal repair at an amateur level, specially studying variables as a quality of life and failure rate. The purpose of this review is to study medium to long-term clinical results in patients at amateur sports patients, that have required meniscal sutures at our center, with or without ACL reconstruction. We evaluate the objective function of the knee, as well as patients' return to sports activities, quality of life, and the rate of failed repair and study of the possible reasons.

methodsThis was an observational retrospective study. Ninety-two patients who regularly perform amateur sports activities (Tegner 4 to 7) were assessed, with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years, divided into 2 groups: group 1, isolated meniscal suture (43 cases) and group 2, associated to ACL reconstruction (49 cases). Each patient made this test in 2019: Lysholm and Tegner (validated for Spanish) before a knee injury and after surgery, motivation to return to sports activity (Likert scale with 3 items: low, regular, or high), and quality of life through SD-12 test.

resultsHigh return to amateur sports rate (92%) was even higher in the isolated meniscal repair group in comparison to the group with associated ACL. We have not found statistically significant differences between sports return and age, gender, injured meniscus, chondral injuries, preoperative Tegner score, or motivation. No significant differences in physical or mental health fields between both groups. Meniscal repair failed in 12 patients (13%). Higher rate of failure in isolated bucket-handle tear injuries (p < 0.0062). No statistically significant association was found between the other variables studied.

conclusionsGood results with 92% of sports return, low rate of complications, and low retear rate, even lower when is associated with ACL reconstruction and in external meniscus repair, and high values at SF-12 between 2 groups.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeReturn to SportSuture TechniquesAdolescentAdultAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKnee InjuriesMaleMeniscusMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesACLMeniscal repairMeniscal tearMeniscusSports return

Identifiers

PMID32854749
PMCPMC7450795
OpenAlexW3080971272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.