Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32854734›Full record

Trial reportReproductive health2020

Engaging parents in digital sexual and reproductive health education: evidence from the JACK trial.

Áine Aventin, Aisling Gough, Theresa McShane, Kathryn Gillespie, Liam O'Hare, Honor Young, Ruth Lewis, Emily Warren, Kelly Buckley, Maria Lohan

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Reproductive health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Effectiveness of Cartoons, Comics, and Animation-Based Sexual Health Promotion and Education Interventions: A Scoping Review.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. A Literature Review of Digital Behavioral Parent Training Programs for Parents of Adolescents.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Áine AventinSchool of Nursing & Midwifery and Centre for Evidence and Social Innovation, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK. a.aventin@qub.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5849-0506
Aisling GoughSchool of Nursing & Midwifery and Centre for Evidence and Social Innovation, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
Theresa McShaneSchool of Nursing & Midwifery and Centre for Evidence and Social Innovation, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
Kathryn GillespieSchool of Nursing & Midwifery and Centre for Evidence and Social Innovation, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
Liam O'HareSchool of Social Sciences, Education and Social Work and Centre for Evidence and Social Innovation, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
Honor YoungSchool of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
Ruth LewisMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Univeristy of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Emily WarrenDepartment of Public Health Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, England, UK.
Kelly BuckleySchool of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
Maria LohanSchool of Nursing & Midwifery and Centre for Evidence and Social Innovation, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
Queen's University Belfast · GBCardiff University · GBMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit · GBRoyal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office SPHSU11Chief Scientist Office SPHSU18Health and Social Care Research and Development Office Northern Ireland N/AMedical Research Council MC_UU_00022/3Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/11Medical Research Council MR/K023233/1National Institute for Health Research (UK) NIHR PHR 15/181/01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch evidence and international policy highlight the central role that parents play in promoting positive sexual behaviour and outcomes in their children, however they can be difficult to engage in sexual and reproductive health (SRH) education programmes. Digital health promotion that uses online and mobile technologies (OMTs) to promote parent-child communication may offer an innovative solution to reach parents, however, few programmes have used OMTs to involve parents in SRH, and none have reported lessons learned in relation to optimising engagement. This study addresses this gap in the literature by reporting acceptability and feasibility of using OMTs to engage parents in SRH education. Findings will be relevant for those wishing to develop and implement digital SRH programmes with parents internationally.

methodsThe Jack Trial is a UK-wide cluster randomised controlled trial recruiting over 8000 adolescents from 66 socially and religiously diverse post-primary schools. An embedded mixed-methods process evaluation explored user engagement with parent components of the If I Were Jack SRH education programme, which include online animated films and a parent-teen homework exercise.

resultsA total of 109 adolescents, teachers, parents and SRH policy experts took part in semi-structured interviews and focus groups, 134 parents responded to an online survey, and 3179 adolescents completed a programme engagement and satisfaction questionnaire. Parents who accessed the materials were positive about them; 87% rated them as 'good or excellent' and 67% said they helped them have conversations with their child about SRH. Web analytics revealed that 27% of contacted parents accessed the digital materials, with 9% viewing the animated films. Only 38% of teachers implemented the homework exercise, mainly because they assumed that students would not complete it or it might result in backlash from parents.

conclusionsWhile digital parental materials show promise for engaging parents in SRH education, this study suggests that in order to optimise engagement, parental components that give parents the necessary skills to have conversations with their children about sex should be coupled with efforts to increase school and teacher confidence to communicate with parents on sensitive topics.

trial registrationISRCTN99459996 .

Indexed as

InternetParent-Child RelationsAdolescentAdultCluster AnalysisFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleMiddle AgedParentsReproductive HealthSex EducationSexual BehaviorSexual HealthAdolescent healthDigital healthInterventionsParent engagementProcess evaluationRandomised controlled trialRelationships and sexuality educationSex educationSexual and reproductive health

Identifiers

PMID32854734
PMCPMC7450800
OpenAlexW3036404218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.