ArticleBMC ophthalmology2020
Neurosarcoidosis presenting as CRVO combined CRAO: a biopsy-proven case report of a Chinese patient.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Case Report: A rare case of combined branch retinal vein occlusion and branch retinal artery occlusion.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Sarcoid Uveitis: An Intriguing Challenger.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNeurosarcoidosis is a rare systemic disorder that can affect the eye and other organs, including the central nervous system. Neurosarcoidosis infiltrating the optic nerve presenting as central retinal vein occlusion combined with artery ischaemia has not been reported in the literature previously. We describe a Chinese patient presenting with acute monocular vision loss, in whom an optic nerve biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of neurosarcoidosis. CASE PRESENTATION: A 47-year-old woman complained of acute decreased vision in her left eye over the course of 1 month. She reported that her vision deteriorated quickly within first 3 days of consulting an ophthalmologist at a local hospital. She was diagnosed with central retinal vein occlusion after funduscopic examination and fundus fluorescein angiography, and the vision in her left eye further deteriorated to no light perception. An orbital magnetic resonance imaging showed an abnormal T1-weighted image of the optic nerve after contrast enhancement. She was referred to a neuro-ophthalmologist for further evaluation. After routine blood tests ruled out infectious and metastatic diseases, she was prescribed 500 mg/d methylprednisolone for 5 days, but her vision did not improve. As she could still not perceive light, an optic nerve biopsy was performed, and the histopathology revealed non-necrotising granuloma that was consistent with neurosarcoidosis.
conclusionsIsolated optic nerve infiltration by neurosarcoidosis without the involvement of the central nervous system or other systemic organs is challenging to diagnose. Biopsy of the optic nerve sheath is crucial for the final diagnosis of neurosarcoidosis. Therefore, a comprehensive ophthalmologic and systemic examination and work-up for inflammation of the eye, chest, and central nervous system should be conducted for atypical cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.