Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32854638›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2020

High burden of self-reported sexually transmitted infections among key populations in Mozambique: the urgent need for an integrated surveillance system.

Makini A S Boothe, Charlotte Comé, Cynthia Semá Baltazar, Noela Chicuecue, Jessica Seleme, Denise Chitsondzo Langa, Isabel Sathane, Henry F Raymond, Erika Fazito, Marleen Temmerman and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 6 countries.

Makini A S BootheFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. makini.boothe@ugent.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5362-5106
Charlotte ComéNational Institute of Health, Maputo, Mozambique.
Cynthia Semá BaltazarFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Noela ChicuecueNational STI-HIV/AIDS Control Program, Ministry of Health, Maputo, Mozambique.
Jessica SelemeNational STI-HIV/AIDS Control Program, Ministry of Health, Maputo, Mozambique.
Denise Chitsondzo LangaNational Institute of Health, Maputo, Mozambique.
Isabel SathaneNational STI-HIV/AIDS Control Program, Ministry of Health, Maputo, Mozambique.
Henry F RaymondSchool of Public Health, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Erika FazitoICAP, Columbia University, Pretoria, South Africa.
Marleen TemmermanFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Stanley LuchtersFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Ghent University · BEMinistry of Health · MZBurnet Institute · AURutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of Pretoria · ZA

Funding

CGH CDC HHS U2GPS001468NCHHSTP CDC HHS U2G PS001468
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKey populations - men who have sex with men (MSM), female sex workers (FSW) and people who inject drugs (PWID) - are at high risk for sexually transmitted infections (STI) given their sexual risk behaviours along with social, legal and structural barriers to prevention, care and treatment services. The purpose of this secondary analysis is to assess the prevalence of self-reported STIs and to describe associated risk factors among participations of the first Biological Behavioural Surveillance (BBS) in Mozambique.

methodsResponses from the first BBS surveys conducted in 2011-2014 were aggregated across survey-cities to produce pooled estimates for each population. Aggregate weighted estimates were computed to analyse self-reported STI prevalence. Unweighted pooled estimates were used in multivariable logistic regression to identify risk factors associated with self-reported STI.

resultsThe prevalence of self-reported STI was 11.9% (95% CI, 7.8-16.0), 33.6% (95% CI, 29.0-41.3), and 22.0% (95% CI, 17.0-27.0) among MSM, FSW and PWID, respectively. MSM who were circumcised, had HIV, reported drug use, reported receptive anal sex, and non-condom use with their last male partner had greater odds of STI self-report. STI-self report among FSW was associated with living in Beira, being married, employment aside from sex work, physical violence, sexual violence, drug use, access to comprehensive HIV prevention services, non-condom use with last client, and sexual relationship with a non-client romantic partner. Among PWID, risk factors for self-reported STI included living in Nampula/Nacala, access to HIV prevention services, and sex work.

conclusionThe high-burden of STIs among survey participants requires integrated HIV and STI prevention, treatment, and harm reduction services that address overlapping risk behaviours, especially injection drug use and sex work. A robust public health response requires the creation of a national STI surveillance system for better screening and diagnostic procedures within these vulnerable populations.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFemaleHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleMozambiquePrevalenceRisk FactorsRisk-TakingSelf ReportSexual and Gender MinoritiesSexually Transmitted DiseasesSexual PartnersSex WorkSex Workers

Identifiers

PMID32854638
PMCPMC7450798
OpenAlexW3080869247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.