Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32854633›Full record

Observational studyBMC pregnancy and childbirth2020

Communication in high risk ante-natal consultations: a direct observational study of interactions between patients and obstetricians.

Jo Hilder, Maria Stubbe, Lindsay Macdonald, Peter Abels, Anthony C Dowell

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. What Do Mothers Want during a High-risk Pregnancy? A Qualitative Study.International journal of community based nursing and midwifery · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jo HilderDepartment of Primary Health Care & General Practice, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand. jo.hilder@otago.ac.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4121-4390
Maria StubbeDepartment of Primary Health Care & General Practice, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Lindsay MacdonaldDepartment of Primary Health Care & General Practice, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Peter AbelsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Anthony C DowellDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.

Funding

University of Otago UORG 2016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective communication is crucial to any doctor-patient consultation, not least in pregnancy where the outcome affects more than one person. While higher levels of patient participation and shared decision making are recognised as desirable, there is little agreement on how best to achieve this. Most previous research in this area is based on reported data such as interviews or surveys and there is a need for more fine-grained analysis of authentic interaction. This study aimed to identify the discourse characteristics and patterns that exemplify effective communication practices in a high-risk ante-natal clinic.

methodsWe video-recorded 20 consultations in a high-risk ante-natal clinic in a large New Zealand city with patients attending for the first time. Post-consultation interviews were conducted with the 20 patients and 13 obstetricians involved. Discourse analysis of the transcripts and videos of the consultations was conducted, in conjunction with thematic analysis of interview transcripts.

resultsMost patients reported high quality communication and high levels of satisfaction; the detailed consultation analysis revealed a range of features likely to have contributed. On the clinician side, these included clear explanations, acknowledgement of the patient's experience, consideration of patient wishes, and realistic and honest answers to patient questions. On the patient side, these included a high level of engagement with technical aspects of events and procedures, and appropriate questioning of obstetricians.

conclusionsThis study has demonstrated the utility of combining direct observation of consultations with data from patient experience interviews to identify specific features of effective communication in routine obstetric ante-natal care. The findings are relevant to improvements needed in obstetric communication identified in the literature, especially in relation to handling psychosocial issues and conveying empathy, and may be useful to inform communication training for obstetricians. The presence of the unborn child may provide an added incentive for parents to develop their own health literacy and to be an active participant in the consultation on behalf of their child. The findings of this study can lay the groundwork for further, more detailed analysis of communication in ante-natal consultations.

Indexed as

CommunicationObstetricsPhysician-Patient RelationsPregnancy, High-RiskPrenatal CareAdultAmbulatory Care FacilitiesFemaleHumansPregnancyYoung AdultAnte-natal clinicHealth communicationHealth provider – patient interactionRisk communication

Identifiers

PMID32854633
PMCPMC7450934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.