Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32854616›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020

Type2 diabetes mellitus prediction using data mining algorithms based on the long-noncoding RNAs expression: a comparison of four data mining approaches.

Faranak Kazerouni, Azadeh Bayani, Farkhondeh Asadi, Leyla Saeidi, Nasrin Parvizi, Zahra Mansoori

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Predictive voting model for early diagnosis of diabetes dataset.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Automated Type 2 Diabetes Case and Control Identification from the MIMIC-IV Database.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Faranak KazerouniDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Azadeh BayaniDepartment of Health Information Technology and Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Farkhondeh AsadiDepartment of Health Information Technology and Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Asadifar@sbmu.ac.ir.
Leyla SaeidiDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Nasrin ParviziDepartment of Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
Zahra MansooriDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRBabol University of Medical Sciences · IRTehran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAbout 90% of patients who have diabetes suffer from Type 2 DM (T2DM). Many studies suggest using the significant role of lncRNAs to improve the diagnosis of T2DM. Machine learning and Data Mining techniques are tools that can improve the analysis and interpretation or extraction of knowledge from the data. These techniques may enhance the prognosis and diagnosis associated with reducing diseases such as T2DM. We applied four classification models, including K-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression, and artificial neural networks (ANN) for diagnosing T2DM, and we compared the diagnostic power of these algorithms with each other. We performed the algorithms on six LncRNA variables (LINC00523, LINC00995, HCG27_201, TPT1-AS1, LY86-AS1, DKFZP) and demographic data.

resultsTo select the best performance, we considered the AUC, sensitivity, specificity, plotted the ROC curve, and showed the average curve and range. The mean AUC for the KNN algorithm was 91% with 0.09 standard deviation (SD); the mean sensitivity and specificity were 96 and 85%, respectively. After applying the SVM algorithm, the mean AUC obtained 95% after stratified 10-fold cross-validation, and the SD obtained 0.05. The mean sensitivity and specificity were 95 and 86%, respectively. The mean AUC for ANN and the SD were 93% and 0.03, also the mean sensitivity and specificity were 78 and 85%. At last, for the logistic regression algorithm, our results showed 95% of mean AUC, and the SD of 0.05, the mean sensitivity and specificity were 92 and 85%, respectively. According to the ROCs, the Logistic Regression and SVM had a better area under the curve compared to the others.

conclusionWe aimed to find the best data mining approach for the prediction of T2DM using six lncRNA expression. According to the finding, the maximum AUC dedicated to SVM and logistic regression, among others, KNN and ANN also had the high mean AUC and small standard deviations of AUC scores among the approaches, KNN had the highest mean sensitivity and the highest specificity belonged to SVM. This study's result could improve our knowledge about the early detection and diagnosis of T2DM using the lncRNAs as biomarkers.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2RNA, AntisenseRNA, Long NoncodingArea Under CurveBiomarkersEarly DiagnosisHumansLogistic ModelsROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificitySupport Vector MachineTumor Protein, Translationally-Controlled 1BiomarkersRNA, AntisenseRNA, Long NoncodingTPT1 protein, humanTumor Protein, Translationally-Controlled 1Data miningGene expressionMachine learning algorithmsType 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID32854616
PMCPMC7451240
OpenAlexW3081255334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.