Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32854500›Full record

ArticleACS synthetic biology2020

FlopR: An Open Source Software Package for Calibration and Normalization of Plate Reader and Flow Cytometry Data.

Alex J H Fedorec, Clare M Robinson, Ke Yan Wen, Chris P Barnes

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS synthetic biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Construction of aACS omega · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Data hazards in synthetic biology.Synthetic biology (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Review
  9. Parsley: a web app for parsing data from plate readers.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alex J H FedorecDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-0165-1705
Clare M RobinsonDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-3581-2810
Ke Yan WenDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-7449-2624
Chris P BarnesDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-9459-1395

Funding

Wellcome Trust 209409/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The measurement of gene expression using fluorescence markers has been a cornerstone of synthetic biology for the past two decades. However, the use of arbitrary units has limited the usefulness of these data for many quantitative purposes. Calibration of fluorescence measurements from flow cytometry and plate reader spectrophotometry has been implemented previously, but the tools are disjointed. Here we pull together, and in some cases improve, extant methods into a single software tool, written as a package in the R statistical framework. The workflow is validated using

Indexed as

SoftwareCalibrationEscherichia coliFlow CytometryGene ExpressionGreen Fluorescent ProteinsGreen Fluorescent Proteinsflow cytometrymolecules of equivalent fluorophoresoftware toolsunit calibration

Identifiers

PMID32854500
PMCPMC7506944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.