Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32854491›Full record

ArticleJournal of pathology and translational medicine2020

A machine-learning expert-supporting system for diagnosis prediction of lymphoid neoplasms using a probabilistic decision-tree algorithm and immunohistochemistry profile database.

Yosep Chong, Ji Young Lee, Yejin Kim, Jingyun Choi, Hwanjo Yu, Gyeongsin Park, Mee Yon Cho, Nishant Thakur

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pathology and translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yosep ChongDepartment of Hospital Pathology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Ji Young LeeDepartment of Hospital Pathology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Yejin KimDepartment of Creative Information Technology, POSTECH, Pohang, Korea.
Jingyun ChoiComputer Science and Engineering, POSTECH, Pohang, Korea.
Hwanjo YuComputer Science and Engineering, POSTECH, Pohang, Korea.
Gyeongsin ParkDepartment of Hospital Pathology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Mee Yon ChoDepartment of Pathology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.
Nishant ThakurDepartment of Hospital Pathology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Catholic University of Korea · KRPohang University of Science and Technology · KRThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USYonsei University · KR

Funding

Ministry of EducationNational Research Foundation of Korea 2016R1D1A1A02937427Postech-Catholic Biomedical Engineering Institute 5-2015-B0001-00112The Korean Society for Pathologist
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmunohistochemistry (IHC) has played an essential role in the diagnosis of hematolymphoid neoplasms. However, IHC interpretations can be challenging in daily practice, and exponentially expanding volumes of IHC data are making the task increasingly difficult. We therefore developed a machine-learning expert-supporting system for diagnosing lymphoid neoplasms.

methodsA probabilistic decision-tree algorithm based on the Bayesian theorem was used to develop mobile application software for iOS and Android platforms. We tested the software with real data from 602 training and 392 validation cases of lymphoid neoplasms and compared the precision hit rates between the training and validation datasets.

resultsIHC expression data for 150 lymphoid neoplasms and 584 antibodies was gathered. The precision hit rates of 94.7% in the training data and 95.7% in the validation data for lymphomas were not statistically significant. Results in most B-cell lymphomas were excellent, and generally equivalent performance was seen in T-cell lymphomas. The primary reasons for lack of precision were atypical IHC profiles for certain cases (e.g., CD15-negative Hodgkin lymphoma), a lack of disease-specific markers, and overlapping IHC profiles of similar diseases.

conclusionsApplication of the machine-learning algorithm to diagnosis precision produced acceptable hit rates in training and validation datasets. Because of the lack of origin- or disease-specific markers in differential diagnosis, contextual information such as clinical and histological features should be taken into account to make proper use of this system in the pathologic decision-making process.

Indexed as

DatabaseExpert-supporting systemImmunohistochemistryMachine learningProbabilistic decision tree

Identifiers

PMID32854491
PMCPMC7674765
OpenAlexW3082487208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.