Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32854468›Full record

ReviewTurkish journal of ophthalmology2020

Update on Contact Lens Treatment of Keratoconus

Tomris Şengör, Sevda Aydın Kurna

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Turkish journal of ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Scleral lenses and PROSE: indications, complications, and future challenges.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Post-Bader procedure: a long-term follow-up case study.Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Short-term visual outcome with sclerocorneal contact lens on irregular cornea.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tomris ŞengörPrivate Practice, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-9436-5582
Sevda Aydın KurnaUniversity of Health Sciences Turkey, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Ophthalmology, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-1183-8776
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Keratoconus (KC) is a progressive disease that leads to a decrease in visual acuity and quality and impairs vision-related quality of life. Contact lens (CL) application has a primary place and importance in the correction of the optic problems due to the disease. The corneal changes and increased irregular astigmatism that occur with KC progression necessitate special CL designs and fitting methods. In addition to disease stage, the patient's lens tolerance also plays a role in the application of CLs in KC patients. With recent advances in materials and design technology, the CLs used in the treatment of KC have developed considerably and there are various types available. In this review, we discuss the wide range of CLs, including rigid and soft lenses, hybrid and scleral lenses, and even custom lens designs, in light of recent scientific advances.

Indexed as

Contact Lenses, HydrophilicQuality of LifeVisual AcuityCorneaCorneal TopographyHumansKeratoconuscontact lenseshybrid lensesKeratoconuspiggyback lensesrigid gas-permeable lensesscleral lensessoft lenses

Identifiers

PMID32854468
PMCPMC7469902
OpenAlexW3081504615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.