ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2020
The Climate and Nutritional Impact of Beef in Different Dietary Patterns in Denmark.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Environmental Impact of Current Diets and Alternative Dietary Scenarios Worldwide: A Systematic Review.Nutrition reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Consumer Attitudes Towards Health, Nutritional and Environmental Concerns of Beef Consumption by Confronting Different Information.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multivariable Analysis of the Carbon Footprint of a Branded Beef Supply Chain Using Individual Animal Data and Carcass Characteristics.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Protein- and nutrient-normalized environmental footprints of university canteen meals.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Carbon footprints of greenhouse gas mitigation measures for a grass-based beef cattle finishing system in the UK.The international journal of life cycle assessment · 2025Article
- Environmental impact of Norwegian self-selected diets: comparing current intake with national dietary guidelines and EAT-Lancet targets.Public health nutrition · 2024Article
- Integrating environmental sustainability into food-based dietary guidelines in the Nordic countries.Food & nutrition research · 2024Review
- Food purchase behaviour in a Finnish population: patterns, carbon footprints and expenditures.Public health nutrition · 2022Article
- Carbon Footprint Reduction by Transitioning to a Diet Consistent with the Danish Climate-Friendly Dietary Guidelines: A Comparison of Different Carbon Footprint Databases.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Dietary Patterns at the Individual Level through a Nutritional and Environmental Approach: The Case Study of a School Canteen.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Changing Food Consumption and Nutrition Intake in Kazakhstan.Nutrients · 2022Article
- Environmental Impact of Meals: How Big Is the Carbon Footprint in the School Canteens?Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Animals Like Us: Leveraging the Negativity Bias in Anthropomorphism to Reduce Beef Consumption.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Patterns of Legume Purchases and Consumption in the United States.Frontiers in nutrition · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
There is public focus on the environmental impact, and in particular, the emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG), related to our food consumption. The aim of the present study was to estimate the carbon footprint (CF), land use and nutritional impact of the different beef products ready to eat in different real-life dietary patterns. Beef products accounted for 513, 560, 409 and 1023 g CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.