ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Investigating a Lock-In Thermal Imaging Setup for the Detection and Characterization of Magnetic Nanoparticles.
Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Magnetic hyperthermia treatments utilize the heat generated by magnetic nanoparticles stimulated by an alternating magnetic field. Therefore, analytical methods are required to precisely characterize the dissipated thermal energy and to evaluate potential amplifying or diminishing factors in order to ensure optimal treatment conditions. Here, we present a lock-in thermal imaging setup specifically designed to thermally measure magnetic nanoparticles and we investigate theoretically how the various experimental parameters may influence the measurement. We compare two detection methods and highlight how an affordable microbolometer can achieve identical sensitivity with respect to a thermal camera-based system by adapting the measurement time. Furthermore, a numerical model is used to demonstrate the optimal stimulation frequency, the degree of nanomaterial heating power, preferential sample holder dimensions and the extent of heat losses to the environment. Using this model, we also revisit some technical assumptions and experimental results that previous studies have stated and suggest an optimal experimental configuration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.