Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32854386›Full record

ArticleNutrients2020

Is the Sustainable Choice a Healthy Choice?-Water Footprint Consequence of Changing Dietary Patterns.

Orsolya Tompa, Zoltán Lakner, Judit Oláh, József Popp, Anna Kiss

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Orsolya TompaDepartment of Food Chain Management, Institute of Agribusiness, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Szent István University, 2100 Gödöllő, Hungary.
Zoltán LaknerDepartment of Food Chain Management, Institute of Agribusiness, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Szent István University, 2100 Gödöllő, Hungary.
Judit OláhManagement Department, Faculty of Applied Sciences, WSB University, 41-300 Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2247-1711
József PoppManagement Department, Faculty of Applied Sciences, WSB University, 41-300 Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland.
Anna KissInstitute of Health Promotion and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Eötvös Loránd University, 1117 Budapest, Hungary.
Magyar Agrár- és Élettudományi Egyetem · HUEötvös Loránd University · HUUniversity of Debrecen · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is evident that the modification of dietary patterns is a necessary precondition of disease prevention and health improvement. Changing nutritional habits also has deep-rooted consequences on the environmental burden. The majority of similar previous studies have analyzed the change in greenhouse gas emissions against theoretical modifications in current food consumption. The analysis on the effect of diet on the water footprint is also gaining in importance, since water supply is a critical global issue. Based on current nutritional patterns of a Central European country-Hungary-as well as dietary recommendations and scientific literature, we generated six dietary scenarios and determined the consequences of these on green (originally from precipitation) and blue (sourced from surface or groundwater) water consumption and dietary quality. Compared to the baseline scenario (current local nutritional pattern) of both genders, based on the integrated aspect of water footprint and dietary quality, the most disadvantageous scenario was the ketogenic (ca. -2% in dietary quality, +18% in blue water footprint, and +16% in green water footprint) and the most advantageous was the sustainable scenario (ca. +9% in dietary quality, -42% in green water footprint, and -29% in blue water footprint). As a summary it can be stated, that (1) there is no clear linear relationship between the "healthiness" and water footprint of different diets, but (2) a more balanced diet, which integrates nutritional and environmental considerations could decrease the environmental burden in an efficient way.

Indexed as

Conservation of Water ResourcesDietDiet, HealthyNutritive ValueWaterHumansHungaryWatercomparative analysisdietary scenariossustainable nutritionwater footprint

Identifiers

PMID32854386
PMCPMC7551173
OpenAlexW3080783276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.