Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32854365›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020

Bacterial Colonization of Irrigation Fluid during Aseptic Revision Knee Arthroplasty.

Michael Fuchs, Matthias Pumberger, Hagen Hommel, Carsten Perka, Philipp von Roth, Kathi Thiele

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Michael FuchsRKU University Department of Orthopaedics, University of Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5557-682X
Matthias PumbergerCenter for Musculoskeletal Surgery, University Department of Orthopaedics, Charité-University Medicine, 10117 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0885-7370
Hagen HommelDepartment of Orthopaedics, Märkisch-Oderland Hospital, 16269 Wriezen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5400-482X
Carsten PerkaCenter for Musculoskeletal Surgery, University Department of Orthopaedics, Charité-University Medicine, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Philipp von RothSporthopaedicum Regensburg and Straubing, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Kathi ThieleCenter for Musculoskeletal Surgery, University Department of Orthopaedics, Charité-University Medicine, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEKrankenhaus Märkisch-Oderland · DEOTH Regensburg · DEUniversität Ulm · DE

Funding

Deutsche Arthrosehilfe P348-A83-Perka-EP5-fuch1-knie-op- II-2016-17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are the subjects of ongoing research. It is unclear if there are specific locations of the surgical area that might act as a pathogen source. Due to the fact that bacterial replication occurs preferably under humid conditions, it was our aim to investigate if irrigation fluid reservoirs on the surgical covers are subject to bacterial colonization. We prospectively observed 40 patients with scheduled aseptic 1-stage TKA revision. At time intervals of 30 min, irrigation samples were tested for microbiological colonization. Additionally, the suction tip was investigated at the end of surgery. Overall, a bacterial detection rate of 25% was found (57/232 samples). Analysis for any positive microbial detection revealed pathogen findings of irrigation fluid in 41.7% of samples after 30 min with a constant increase up to 77.8% after 90 min. Twenty-three percent of suction tips showed bacterial colonization. Coagulase-negative staphylococci, accounting for the majority of PJI, were the predominant pathogens. After an average follow-up of 17 months, no PJI was confirmed. Despite the substantial bacterial load of irrigation fluid, PJI rates were not elevated. Nevertheless, we recommend that irrigation fluid reservoirs should be prevented and not withdrawn by suction.

Indexed as

fluid reservoirsirrigation liquidsurgical contaminationtotal knee replacement

Identifiers

PMID32854365
PMCPMC7565972
OpenAlexW3080259706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.