ArticlePharmaceutics2020
Novel In Vitro Investigational Methods for Modeling Skin Permeation: Skin PAMPA, Raman Mapping.
Article in Pharmaceutics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- In Vitro and Ex Vivo Studies on the Absorption and Distribution of β-Cyclodextrin Polymer.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems: Methods for Enhancing Skin Permeability and Their Evaluation.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Assessing Barrier Function in Psoriasis and Cornification Models of Artificial Skin Using Non-Invasive Impedance Spectroscopy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Foams Set a New Pace for the Release of Diclofenac Sodium.Pharmaceutics · 2024Article
- Optical Methods for Non-Invasive Determination of Skin Penetration: Current Trends, Advances, Possibilities, Prospects, and Translation into In Vivo Human Studies.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Recent Options and Techniques to Assess Improved Bioavailability: In Vitro and Ex Vivo Methods.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Development of Capsaicin-Containing Analgesic Silicone-Based Transdermal Patches.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Comparison of Synthetic Membranes to Heat-Separated Human Epidermis in Skin Permeation Studies In Vitro.Pharmaceutics · 2021Article
- The Implications of Regulatory Framework for Topical Semisolid Drug Products: From Critical Quality and Performance Attributes towards Establishing Bioequivalence.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The human skin is marked as a standard by the regulatory agencies in the permeation study of dermal formulations. Artificial membranes can substitute human skin to some extent. Academicians and pharmaceutical corporations are focusing their efforts on developing standardized protocols and safe, reliable options to substitute human skin for carrying out permeability studies. Our research aim was to study the applicability of new techniques in the case of different types of dermal formulations. The skin parallel artificial membrane permeability assay (PAMPA) method and Raman mapping were compared to the gold-standard Franz cell method. A hydrogel and two types of creams were investigated as the most generally used dermal preparations. The values of the diffused drug were closer to each other in PAMPA and Franz cell measurement. The diffused amount of drug showed the same order for the different formulations. These results correlate well with the results of Raman mapping. Our conclusions suggest that all early screening examinations can be performed with model tools such as skin PAMPA supplemented with methods like Raman mapping as a semi-quantitative method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.