Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32854269›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Comparison of Clinical Manifestations, Treatments, and Outcomes between Vespidae Sting and Formicidae Sting Patients in the Emergency Department in Taiwan.

Yen-Yue Lin, Chih-Chien Chiu, Hsin-An Chang, Yung-Hsi Kao, Po-Jen Hsiao, Chih-Pin Chuu

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yen-Yue LinDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Taoyuan Armed Forces General Hospital, Taoyuan City 325, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-6885-2523
Chih-Chien ChiuDivision of Infectious Disease and Tropical Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Taoyuan Armed Forces General Hospital, Taoyuan City 325, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-4699-1669
Hsin-An ChangDepartment of Psychiatry, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-5572-7109
Yung-Hsi KaoDepartment of Life Sciences, National Central University, Taoyuan City 320, Taiwan.
Po-Jen HsiaoDepartment of Life Sciences, National Central University, Taoyuan City 320, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-4965-0285
Chih-Pin ChuuInstitute of Cellular and System Medicine, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli County 350, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-7206-7923
Tri-Service General Hospital · TWNational Central University · TWNational Health Research Institutes · TWTaoyuan Armed Forces General Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHymenopteran stings are the most common animal insult injury encountered in the emergency department. With increasing global spread of imported fire ants in recent decades, the rate of Formicidae assault has become a serious problem in many countries. Formicidae-associated injuries gradually increased in Taiwan in recent decades and became the second most common arthropod assault injury in our ED. The present study aimed at comparing the clinical characteristics of Formicidae sting patients with those of the most serious and common group, Vespidae sting patients, in an emergency department (ED) in Taiwan.

methodsThis retrospective study included patients who were admitted between 2015 to 2018 to the ED in a local teaching hospital in Taiwan after a Vespidae or Formicidae sting. Cases with anaphylactic reaction were further compared.

resultsWe reviewed the records of 881 subjects (503 males, 378 females; mean age, 49.09 ± 17.62 years) who visited our emergency department due to Vespidae or Formicidae stings. A total of 538 (61.1%) were categorized into the Vespidae group, and 343 (38.9%) were sorted into the Formicidae group. The Formicidae group had a longer ED length of stay (79.15 ± 92.30 vs. 108.00 ± 96.50 min,

conclusionFormicidae sting patients presented to the ED with higher rate allergic reactions and spent more time in the ED than Vespidae sting patients. However, Vespidae sting patients had more complications and higher rates of admission, especially with anaphylactic reaction. Laboratory data, especially creatine kinase data, were more valuable to check in Vespidae sting patients with an anaphylactic reaction in the ED. Both groups exhibited positive correlations with temperature and a higher rate on weekend days.

Indexed as

AntsWaspsAdultAgedAnaphylaxisAnimalsAnt VenomsEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHistamine AntagonistsHumansInsect Bites and StingsLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAnt VenomsHistamine AntagonistsWasp Venomsanaphylaxisemergency departmentFormicidaehymenopteraVespidae

Identifiers

PMID32854269
PMCPMC7504193
OpenAlexW3081344005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.