ReviewPharmaceutics2020
CRISPR/Cas9 Delivery Potentials in Alzheimer's Disease Management: A Mini Review.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Extracellular Vesicles in Alzheimer's Disease: Dual Roles in Pathogenesis, Promising Avenues for Diagnosis and Therapy.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- An overview of gene and cell therapy approaches for Alzheimer's disease.Metabolic brain disease · 2025Review
- Extracellular vesicles as therapeutic modulators of neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease: a focus on signaling mechanisms.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2025Review
- Precision Medicine in Neurodegenerative Diseases: Genomic Approaches to Target Amyloid-β, Tau, and Alpha-Synuclein Pathways.Current genomics · 2025Review
- CRISPR-Cas technologies in neurodegenerative disorders: mechanistic insights, therapeutic potential, and translational challenges.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- CRISPR/Cas9-Based therapeutics as a promising strategy for management of Alzheimer's disease: progress and prospects.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2025Review
- Stem cell and CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing technology in Alzheimer's disease therapy: from basic research to clinical innovation.Frontiers in genome editing · 2025Review
- Revolutionizing Neuroimmunology: Unraveling Immune Dynamics and Therapeutic Innovations in CNS Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Application of CRISPR/Cas9 System in the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease and Neurodegenerative Diseases.Molecular neurobiology · 2024Review
- Exploring Advanced CRISPR Delivery Technologies for Therapeutic Genome Editing.Small science · 2024Article
- Role and application of CRISPR-Cas9 in the management of Alzheimer's disease.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Review
- CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing: A Novel Approach Towards Alzheimer's Disease Treatment.CNS & neurological disorders drug targets · 2024Review
- Genome editing and cancer therapy: handling the hypoxia-responsive pathway as a promising strategy.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2023Review
- Applications and challenges of CRISPR-Cas gene-editing to disease treatment in clinics.Precision clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Chromatin Alterations in Neurological Disorders and Strategies of (Epi)Genome Rescue.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Application of CRISPR/Cas9 in Alzheimer's Disease.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common dementia disorder. While genetic mutations account for only 1% of AD cases, sporadic AD resulting from a combination of genetic and risk factors constitutes >90% of the cases. Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)-associated protein (Cas9) is an impactful gene editing tool which identifies a targeted gene sequence, creating a double-stranded break followed by gene inactivation or correction. Although CRISPR/Cas9 can be utilized to irreversibly inactivate or correct faulty genes in AD, a safe and effective delivery system stands as a challenge against the translation of CRISPR therapeutics from bench to bedside. While viral vectors are efficient in CRISPR/Cas9 delivery, they might introduce fatal side effects and immune responses. As non-viral vectors offer a better safety profile, cost-effectiveness and versatility, they can be promising for the in vivo delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 therapeutics. In this minireview, we present an overview of viral and non-viral vector based CRISPR/Cas9 therapeutic strategies that are being evaluated on pre-clinical AD models. Other promising non-viral vectors that can be used for genome editing in AD, such as nanoparticles, nanoclews and microvesicles, are also discussed. Finally, we list the formulation and technical aspects that must be considered in order to develop a successful non-viral CRISPR/Cas9 delivery vehicle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.