Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32854232›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020

Point-of-Care Assays Could Be Useful for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of IBD Patients in a Proactive Strategy with Adalimumab.

Mohamad Cherry, Dominique Dutzer, Yara Nasser, Anne-Emmanuelle Berger, Xavier Roblin, Stephane Paul

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mohamad CherryDepartment of Immunology, CIC1408, GIMAP EA3064, University Hospital of Saint Etienne, 42055 Saint Etienne, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1391-1084
Dominique DutzerDepartment of Immunology, CIC1408, GIMAP EA3064, University Hospital of Saint Etienne, 42055 Saint Etienne, France.
Yara NasserDepartment of Immunology, CIC1408, GIMAP EA3064, University Hospital of Saint Etienne, 42055 Saint Etienne, France.
Anne-Emmanuelle BergerDepartment of Immunology, CIC1408, GIMAP EA3064, University Hospital of Saint Etienne, 42055 Saint Etienne, France.
Xavier RoblinDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Saint Etienne, 42055 Saint Etienne, France.
Stephane PaulDepartment of Immunology, CIC1408, GIMAP EA3064, University Hospital of Saint Etienne, 42055 Saint Etienne, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8830-4273
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of the study was to evaluate whether Point-of-Care (POC) assays are equivalent to ELISAs for measuring residual trough levels of adalimumab (ADA) in a cohort of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) patients. ADA trough levels obtained by POC assays were used to optimize patients in daily clinical practice. Different assays (three ELISAs (Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay) from two different suppliers and two POC assays) were compared to measure ADA trough levels in a first cohort of 31 IBD patients. All assays revealed a high correlation within the assays, ranging from 0.86 to 0.99. Cut-off values were always higher with ELISAs than with POC assays. Then, a small prospective clinical study with a second cohort of 37 IBD patients was performed to compare POC assays and ELISAs for their ability to optimize patients on the basis of the measured ADA trough levels. The use of a POC assay to monitor ADA trough levels did not improve the follow-up of patients with loss of response, as they were always optimized whatever their ADA residual rate. For patients in clinical remission, a POC assay can be useful in some clinical situations to maintain or de-escalate ADA doses according to the measured trough levels. In conclusion, different assays for ADA monitoring are quite equivalent. A POC assay could be only useful for a proactive strategy for asymptomatic patients with a sub-therapeutic dose of ADA, but new therapeutic thresholds need to be identified.

Indexed as

adalimumabIBDPOC (Point of Care)residual trough levelstherapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)

Identifiers

PMID32854232
PMCPMC7565289
OpenAlexW3081181261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.