Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32854221›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2020

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Food Safety and Hygiene Training on Food Handlers.

Andrea Insfran-Rivarola, Diego Tlapa, Jorge Limon-Romero, Yolanda Baez-Lopez, Marco Miranda-Ackerman, Karina Arredondo-Soto, Sinue Ontiveros

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Healthy Public Policy Must Build Capacity: Analysing the Implementation of 3.2.2A, Australia's New Food Safety Standard.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrea Insfran-RivarolaDepartamento de Ingeniería Industrial, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, Paraguay, San Lorenzo 2160, Paraguay.ORCID 0000-0001-8040-2883
Diego TlapaFacultad de Ingeniería, Arquitectura y Diseño-Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Ensenada 22870, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-1491-5442
Jorge Limon-RomeroFacultad de Ingeniería, Arquitectura y Diseño-Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Ensenada 22870, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-2117-4803
Yolanda Baez-LopezFacultad de Ingeniería, Arquitectura y Diseño-Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Ensenada 22870, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-8418-254X
Marco Miranda-AckermanFacultad de Ciencias Químicas e Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Tijuana 22390, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-7041-7130
Karina Arredondo-SotoFacultad de Ciencias Químicas e Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Tijuana 22390, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-8929-7319
Sinue OntiverosFacultad de Ciencias de la Ingeniería, Administrativas y Sociales, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Tecate 21460, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-0844-0273

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foodborne diseases are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Studies have shown that the knowledge, attitude, and practices of food handlers are important factors in preventing foodborne illness. The purpose of this research is to assess the effects of training interventions on knowledge, attitude, and practice on food safety and hygiene among food handlers at different stages of the food supply chain. To this end, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis with close adherence to the PRISMA guidelines. We searched for training interventions among food handlers in five databases. Randomized control trials (RCT), quasi-RCTs, controlled before-after, and nonrandomized designs, including pre-post studies, were analyzed to allow a more comprehensive assessment. The meta-analysis was conducted using the random-effects model to calculate the effect sizes (Hedges's g) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Out of 1094 studies, 31 were included. Results showed an effect size of 1.24 (CI = 0.89-1.58) for knowledge, an attitude effect size of 0.28 (CI = 0.07-0.48), and an overall practice effect size of 0.65 (CI = 0.24-1.06). In addition, subgroups of self-reported practices and observed practices presented effect sizes of 0.80 (CI = 0.13-1.48) and 0.45 (CI = 0.15-0.76) respectively.

Indexed as

attitudebehaviorfoodborne diseasesfood handlersfood safetyhygieneknowledgepracticestraining

Identifiers

PMID32854221
PMCPMC7555000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.