Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32854206›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020

Self-Limiting versus Rotary Subjective Carious Tissue Removal: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial-2-Year Results.

Ahmed H Ali, Farah Ben Thani, Federico Foschi, Avijit Banerjee, Francesco Mannocci

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03071588 (Assessment of a New Protocol for Indirect Pulp Capping Procedures), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03071588 naunknown statusnot on this map

Assessment of a New Protocol for Indirect Pulp Capping Procedures

TypeinterventionalSponsorKing's College LondonRan2014 to 2018Enrolled86ConditionsReversible PulpitisArmsMechanical rotary burs, Carisolv gel
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Ahmed H AliAesthetic and Restorative Dentistry Department, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Baghdad 10001, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0002-1083-9913
Farah Ben ThaniDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London Floor 22 Tower Wing, Guy's Dental Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK.
Federico FoschiDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London Floor 22 Tower Wing, Guy's Dental Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6901-0280
Avijit BanerjeeConservative & MI Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London Floor 25 Tower Wing, Guy's Dental Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0091-7348
Francesco MannocciDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London Floor 22 Tower Wing, Guy's Dental Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0560-1054
Guy's Hospital · GBUniversity of Baghdad · IQ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundthe aim of this study was to assess the 2-year pulp survival of deep carious lesions in teeth excavated using a self-limiting protocol in a single-blind randomized controlled clinical trial.

methodsAt baseline, 101 teeth with deep carious lesions in 86 patients were excavated randomly using self-limiting or control protocols. Standardized clinical examination and periapical radiographs of teeth were performed after 1- and 2-year follow-ups (REC 14/LO/0880).

resultsDuring the 2-year period of the study, 24 teeth failed (16 and 8 at T12 and T24, respectively). Final analysis shows that 39/63 (61.9%) of teeth were deemed successful (16/33 (48.4%) and 23/30 (76.6%) in the control and experimental groups, respectively with a statistically significant difference (z score = 2.3,

conclusionafter 2 years, there was a statistically significant higher pulp survival rate of teeth with deep carious lesions excavated using self-limiting protocols in patients with reversible pulpitis. Molars showed higher success than premolars in teeth excavated using the self-limiting protocol. There was no statistically significant association between the outcome and the severity of symptoms at T0 (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03071588).

Indexed as

cariesCarisolvchemomechanical gelclinical trialcomputed tomographymicroscopyminimally invasive dentistryperiapical radiographpulpitisrotary excavationselective caries removal

Identifiers

PMID32854206
PMCPMC7564758
OpenAlexW3081388090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.