ArticleTranslational oncology2020
Oncogenic fusion protein FGFR2-PPHLN1: Requirements for biological activation, and efficacy of inhibitors.
Article in Translational oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aim of studyChromosomal translocations such as t(10;12)(q26,q12) are associated with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, a universally fatal category of liver cancer. This translocation creates the oncogenic fusion protein of Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 2 joined to Periphilin 1. The aims of this study were to identify significant features required for biological activation, analyze the activation of downstream signaling pathways, and examine the efficacy of the TKIs BGJ398 and TAS-120, and of the MEK inhibitor Trametinib.
methodsThese studies examined FGFR2-PPHLN1 proteins containing a kinase-dead, kinase-activated, or WT kinase domain in comparison with analogous FGFR2 proteins. Biological activity was assayed using soft agar colony formation in epithelial RIE-1 cells and focus assays in NIH3T3 cells. The MAPK/ERK, JAK/STAT3 and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways were examined for activation. Membrane association was analyzed by indirect immunofluorescence comparing proteins altered by deletion of the signal peptide, or by addition of a myristylation signal.
resultsBiological activity of FGFR2-PPHLN1 required an active FGFR2-derived tyrosine kinase domain, and a dimerization domain contributed by PPHLN1. Strong activation of canonical MAPK/ERK, JAK/STAT3 and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways was observed. The efficacy of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors BGJ398 and TAS-120 was examined individually and combinatorially with the MEK inhibitor Trametinib; heterogeneous responses were observed in a mutation-specific manner. A requirement for membrane localization of the fusion protein was also demonstrated. CONCLUDING STATEMENT: Our study collectively demonstrates the potent transforming potential of FGFR2-PPHLN1 in driving cellular proliferation. We discuss the importance of sequencing-based, mutation-specific personalized therapeutics in treating FGFR2 fusion-positive intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.