Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32853704›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry2021

A Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effects of Intervention Intensity and Intervention Style on Outcomes for Young Children With Autism.

Sally J Rogers, Paul Yoder, Annette Estes, Zachary Warren, John McEachin, Jeff Munson, Marie Rocha, Jessica Greenson, Lisa Wallace, Elizabeth Gardner and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02272192 (Intervention Effects of Intensity and Delivery Style for Toddlers With Autism), which is not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02272192 nacompletednot on this map

Intervention Effects of Intensity and Delivery Style for Toddlers With Autism

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, DavisRan2013 to 2019Enrolled87ConditionsAutism Spectrum DisorderArmsEarly Start Denver Model (ESDM), Early Intensive Behavioral Intervention (EIBI)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Heterogeneity of Response to Early Start Denver Model: Identifying Developmental Trajectories and Predictors of Cognitive Outcomes.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Proportion and Profile of Autistic Children Not Acquiring Spoken Language Despite Receiving Evidence-Based Early Interventions.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53 · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Probability of Intervention Benefit in the Early Start Denver Model.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sally J RogersUniversity of California, Davis MIND Institute, Davis. Electronic address: sjrogers@ucdavis.edu.
Paul YoderVanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Annette EstesUniversity of Washington, Seattle.
Zachary WarrenVanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
John McEachinPrivate Practice, Seal Beach, California.
Jeff MunsonUniversity of Washington, Seattle.
Marie RochaUniversity of California, Davis MIND Institute, Davis.
Jessica GreensonUniversity of Washington, Seattle.
Lisa WallaceVanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Elizabeth GardnerVanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Geraldine DawsonDuke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Catherine A SugarUniversity of California, Los Angeles.
Gerhard HellemannUniversity of California, Los Angeles.
Fiona WhelanUniversity of California, Los Angeles.
Vanderbilt University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Washington · USUniversity of California, Davis · USDuke University · US

Funding

Intervention effects of intensity and delivery style for toddlers with ASDR01MH100030 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI ROGERS, SALLY J · 2013 to 2017
$13.4M
Overall: Eunice Kennedy Shriver Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at VanderbiltP50HD103537 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Lea K Davis · 2020 to 2026
$10.3M
Rodent Behavior CoreU54HD079125 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI ABBEDUTO, LEONARD J. · 2013 to 2019
$8.5M
Interdisciplinary Training for Autism Researchers(RMI)T32MH073124 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI Stephen Charles Noctor, Christine Wu Nordahl · 2004 to 2026
$6.8M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103537NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD079125NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH100030NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH073124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis randomized, multisite, intent-to-treat study tested the effects of 2 levels of treatment intensity (number of hours) and 2 treatment styles on the progress of young children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We predicted that initial severity of developmental delay or autism symptoms would moderate the effects of intensity and style on progress in 4 domains: autism symptom severity, expressive communication, receptive language, and nonverbal ability.

methodA total of 87 children with ASD, mean age 23.4 months, were assigned to 1 of 2 intervention styles (naturalistic developmental/behavioral or discrete trial teaching), each delivered for either 15 or 25 hours per week of 1:1 intervention for 12 months by trained research staff. All caregivers received coaching twice monthly. Children were assessed at 4 timepoints. Examiners and coders were naive to treatment assignment.

resultsNeither style nor intensity had main effects on the 4 outcome variables. In terms of moderating the effects of initial severity of developmental delay and of autism symptom severity, neither moderated the effects of treatment style on progress in any of the 4 domains. In terms of treatment intensity, initial severity moderated effect of treatment intensity on only 1 domain, namely, change in autism symptom severity; in a secondary analysis, this effect was found in only 1 site.

conclusionNeither treatment style nor intensity had overall effects on child outcomes in the 4 domains examined. Initial severity did not predict better response to 1 intervention style than to another. We found very limited evidence that initial severity predicted better response to 25 vs 15 hours per week of intervention in the domains studied. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: Intervention Effects of Intensity and Delivery Style for Toddlers With Autism: https://clinicaltrials.gov/; NCT02272192.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderAutistic DisorderChild, PreschoolCommunicationEarly Intervention, EducationalHumansInfantautism spectrum disorderearly intensive behavioral interventionearly interventionEarly Start Denver Modeltreatment intensity

Identifiers

PMID32853704
PMCPMC8057785
OpenAlexW3080547514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.