ArticleEnvironmental research2020
Exposure to DDT from indoor residual spraying and biomarkers of inflammation among reproductive-aged women from South Africa.
Article in Environmental research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bisphenol A and DDT disrupt adipocyte function in the mammary gland: implications for breast cancer risk and progression.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEvidence from animal studies suggests that DDT and DDE can adversely affect immuno-competence while human data are less conclusive. We aimed to assess the association of plasma concentrations of DDT and DDE with biomarkers of inflammation among reproductive-aged women residing in homes sprayed with DDT through Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS).
methodsThis study included 416 women from the Study of Women and Babies, South Africa (2010-2011). DDT, DDE, and biomarkers of inflammation (immunoglobulins A, G and M, interleukins 1β, 6, and 8, tumor necrosis factor-α, C-reactive protein, serum amyloid-A, intercellular adhesion molecule-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1) were quantified in plasma. Linear regression was used to assess associations of DDT and DDE with each natural log-transformed biomarker. Models were adjusted for age, body mass index, parity, income, and season; beta estimates were expressed as percent differences.
resultsCompared to women with the lowest plasma concentrations of DDT and DDE, those with the highest concentrations of both compounds had higher levels IL-1β, IL6, and TNF- α. While associations were statistically significant for both DDT and DDE, the magnitude of the associations was slightly stronger for DDT. Compared to women in the lowest quintile of DDT, women in the highest quintile were estimated to have 53.0% (95%CI: 21.7%, 84.4%), 28.1% (95%CI: 6.4%, 49.8%), and 26.6% (95%CI: 12.0%, 41.1%) higher levels of IL-1β, IL6, and TNF- α, respectively.
conclusionsOur results suggest that increased plasma concentrations of DDT and DDE resulting from exposure to IRS may increase concentrations of pro-inflammatory biomarkers among reproductive-aged women in South Africa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.